Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009Revisiting automatic first arrival picking for large 3D land surveysAuthors: Timothy H. KehoWeihong ZhuTimothy H. KehoSaudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaSearch for more papers by this author and Weihong ZhuSaudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255521 SectionsSupplemental MaterialAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract The ever increasing number of traces in 3D land surveys has motivated us to revisit methods for automatically picking first arrivals for near surface model building. The time required to pick first arrivals using the interactive auto‐picking approach can consume many months for surveys consisting of hundreds of millions of traces. For this reason, first arrivals are typically picked only on a small percentage of the survey traces. As the size of surveys continues to increase, it will soon become impossible to use interactive auto‐picking. Fully automatic first arrival picking and quality control in the production processing environment will be required. To achieve this goal, we must revisit existing auto‐picking techniques, but with a new vision. We must turn the disadvantage of large data volumes into an advantage. The statistics available from large data sets, particularly for wide azimuth surveys, allows us to worry less about the quality of each auto‐pick, and instead, rely on surface consistent quality control and the travel time inversion process to produce high quality near surface velocity model. We present examples of how a fully automatic technique has reduced the time for picking first arrivals and building the near surface model from months to days, and by utilizing all of the available data, has also resulted in higher quality final stacked images.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255521FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byMemory‐efficient frequency‐domain Gauss–Newton method for wave‐equation first‐arrival traveltime inversion17 May 2021 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 19, No. 4Near-surface velocity estimation using source-domain full traveltime inversion and early arrival waveform inversionLu Liu, Yan Wu, Bowen Guo, Song Han, and Yi Luo13 June 2018 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 83, No. 4Application of undecimated discrete wavelet transforms (UDWT) for seismic refraction velocity analysis improvement25 May 2018 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 11, No. 11Workflow for near-surface velocity automatic estimation: Source-domain full-traveltime inversion followed by waveform inversionLu Liu, Tong Fei, Yi Luo, and Bowen Guo17 August 2017An efficient first arrival picking procedure for marine streamer data5 June 2015 | Geosystem Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 5Optimization approach to automatic first arrival picking for three-component three-dimensional vertical seismic profiling data1 December 2011 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 60, No. 6Enhancement of first arrivals using the τ-p transform on energy-ratio seismic shot recordsWail A. Mousa and Abdullatif A. Al-Shuhail9 April 2012 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 77, No. 3Focus on land seismic technology: The near-surface challengeTimothy H. Keho and Panos G. Kelamis10 January 2012 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 31, No. 1New concepts in quality control for 3D near surface modelingRoy Burnstad14 October 2009A new era in land seismic: The near surface challengeTimothy H. Keho and Panos G. Kelamis14 October 2009 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2009 Pages: 4338 publication data© 2009 Copyright © 2009 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 14 Oct 2009 CITATION INFORMATION Timothy H. Keho and Weihong Zhu, (2009), "Revisiting automatic first arrival picking for large 3D land surveys," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 3198-3202. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255521 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

First Arrival Picking Based on Image Processing Methods

First-arrival automatic picking based on improved energy ratio method and outlier detection theory

First-arrival picking through pattern matching and threshold adjustment

Active Source Seismic Identification and Automatic Picking of the P ̄wave First Arrival Using a Convolutional Neural Network 1

Automatic First-Arrival Pickingmethod Via Intelligent Markov Optimal Decision Processes

Automatic First Arrival Time Identification Using Fuzzy C -Means and AIC

Semiautomatic First-Arrival Picking of Microseismic Events by Using the Pixel-Wise Convolutional Image Segmentation Method

First-arrival picking through fuzzy c-means and robust locally weighted regression

A Method of Automatic First Arrival Extraction Based on One-Dimensional Slice of Cross-Fourth-Order Cumulants

Improving the accuracy of predicted first-arrival times using deep learning

Automatic First-Breaks Picking Algorithm under the Constraint of Image Segmentation

Seismic P-wave First-Arrival Picking Model Based on EQK-IncResNet.

Automatic First Break Picking Based on Constrained Markov Decision Processes (Cmdps)

First Arrival Time Picking for Microseismic Data Based on Shearlet Transform

First Arrival Time Picking for Microseismic Data Based on DWSW Algorithm

Review of automatic onset time picking for seismic arrivals

Revisiting automatic first arrival picking for large 3D land surveys

First-Arrival Picking Method for Active Source Data with Ocean Bottom Seismometers Based on Spatial Waveform Variation Characteristics

A High-Precision Elliptical Target Identification Method for Image Sequences

Arrival Picking And Global Refinement For Microseismic Events Based On Waveform Similarity

A fine-tuning workflow for automatic first-break picking with deep learning