Abstract:Objective: To establish a predictive model for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critical burn patients with the screened independent risk factors, and to validate its predictive value. Methods: Totally 131 critical burn patients (101 males and 30 females, aged 18-84 years) who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2018 to December 2019. A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The patients were divided into ARDS group (54 cases) and non-ARDS group (77 cases) according to whether ARDS occurred or not. The statistics of patients in the two groups were recorded including the gender, age, burn index, combination of inhalation injury, smoking history, delayed resuscitation, indwelling nasogastric tube, and complication of sepsis, and the data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact probability test. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the indicators with statistically significant differences between the two groups to screen the independent risk factors for developing ARDS in critical burn patients, and the corresponding nomograph prediction model for the risk of ARDS in critical burn patients was established. The risk scores for patients developing ARDS were therefore obtained based on the above-mentioned nomograph, and the corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to calculate the area under the curve. The internal validation of the above-mentioned ARDS prediction model was performed using the Bootstrap method, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated for modeling group (79 cases) and validation group (52 cases), respectively. A calibration curve was drawn to assess the predictive conformity of the above-mentioned ARDS prediction model for the occurrence of ARDS in critical burn patients. Results: The burn index, proportion of combination of inhalation injury, and proportion of complication of sepsis of patients were significantly higher in ARDS group than in non-ARDS group (t=0.36, χ2=33.78, 49.92, P<0.01). The gender, age, smoking history, delayed resuscitation, and indwelling nasogastric tube of patients in ARDS group were close to those in non-ARDS group (P>0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the burn index, combination of inhalation injury, and complication of sepsis were the independent risk factors for developing ARDS in critical burn patients (odds ratio=1.05, 15.33, 5.02, 95% confidence interval=1.01-1.10, 2.65-88.42, 1.28-19.71, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The overall area under the ROC curve of the above-mentioned ARDS prediction model was 0.92 (95% confidence interval=0.88-0.97), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.95 and 0.91 (95% confidence interval=0.90-1.00, 0.86-0.97) for validation group and modeling group, respectively. When applying the above-mentioned ARDS prediction model for ARDS incidence prediction, there might be some risk of overestimating ARDS incidence when the prediction probability was <35.0% or >85.0%, and some risk of underestimating ARDS incidence when the prediction probability was 35.0%-85.0%. Conclusions: The burn index, inhalation injury, and sepsis are the independent risk factors for the occurrence of ARDS in critical burn patients. The risk prediction model for ARDS based on these three indicators has good predictive ability for ARDS in critical burn patients.

The Predictive Value of Serum Neopterin for Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Extensive Burned Patients

[Serum Neopterin Levels after Extensive Burns and Their Relationship to Endotoxemia and Sepsis].

Elevated Serum Neopterin Level: Its Relation to Endotoxaemia and Sepsis in Patients with Major Burns.

The Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on the 6th Day Postburn Is Associated with Clinical Outcome of Severe Burns.

Reduction Of Plasma Gelsolin Levels Correlates With Development Of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome And Fatal Outcome In Burn Patients

The Asynchronous Dynamic Changes and Interrelationships Between Leukocyte Composition and Inflammatory Markers and Potential Clinical Significance in the Early Stage and Sepsis Stage in Severe Burns.

Prognosis factors for extremely severe burn patients combined with sepsis

[The Significance of Changes in Serum Soluble Lipopolysaccharide Receptor CD14 Levels in Burned Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome].

EFFECTS OF EARLY TOTAL ENTERAL NUTRITION ON SEVERELY BURNED PATIENTS

Associated Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients Surviving Extensive Burns: A Large Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Establishment and predictive value analysis of the prediction model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critical burn patients

[Preliminary Comparative Study on the Effects of Early Enteral Supplementation of Synbiotics on Severely Burned Patients].

Admission Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predicts Survival in Patients with Extensive Burns.

Economic Evaluation of Early Enteral Nutrition in Severely Burned Patients

Establishment of a Predictive Model for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Analysis of Its Predictive Value in Critical Burn Patients

Plasma Gelsolin Level and Its Relationship with the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Burns

Immunological activity change of regulatory T cells and its relation with outcome of patients with severe burn

[Prevention and Treatment of MODS in Severely Burned Patients: an Institute Based Retrospective Study].

Suppression of overactivated immunity in the early stage is the key to improve the prognosis in severe burns

Investigation and assessment of neutrophil dysfunction early after severe burn injury

[Prognostic Significance of Plasma Gelsolin in Severe Burn Patients with Sepsis].