Dating of the Peking Man Site:A Comparison Between Existing Chronology and the ~(26)Al/~(10)Be Burial Ages

CHEN Tie-mei,ZHOU Li-ping

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2009.03.007

2009-01-01

Abstract:Two chronological frameworks for Locality 1 at the Peking Man Site of Zhoukoudian,Beijing are discussed. One is based on the previously published dates using the fission track,U-series,palaeomagnetism and ESR methods. The other is based on the ages recently obtained with the U-series dating of flowstone and the 26 Al/ 10 Be burial dating.While both frameworks recognize that the Brunhes-Matuyama Boundary of 0.78 Ma is placed below the 13 th layer at Locality 1 of Zhoukoudian,two different ages of about 0.45 Ma and 0.77±0.08 Ma are suggested for the 8-9 th layers respectively by these two frameworks,i.e. the difference being as large as 0.3 Ma. Significant changes in lithography,fauna and flora were observed from the 8-9 th to the 13 th layer,indicating at least one glacial-interglacial cycle. The 26 Al/ 10 Be burial age of 0.77 Ma for the 8-9 th layers would squeeze five stratigraphical layers into a narrow time interval. This is hard to understand. Factors which may cause systematic errors in the 26 Al/ 10 Be burial dating are discussed,such as the uncertainty of the half-life of the 10 Be,the uncertainty with the ratio of the production rates of 26 Al and 10 Be,and the complexity and unpredictability of the exposure-burial history of the quartz samples.Further chronological studies on the Peking Man Site are also suggested.