Abstract:We investigate the potential of deliberation to create consensus among fully-informed citizens. Our approach relies on two cognitive assumptions: i. citizens need a thinking frame (or perspective) to consider an issue; and ii. citizens cannot consider all relevant perspectives simultaneously, but only sequentially. Altogether, these assumptions imply that the citizens opinions are intrinsically contextual, and exhibit features analogous to those of quantum systems. Formally, we capture contextuality in a simple quantum-like cognitive model. We consider a binary voting problem, in which citizens with incompatible thinking frames and initially opposite voting intentions deliberate under the guidance of a benevolent facilitator. We find that offering a citizen the opportunity to probe alternative thinking frames may allow them change opinion. The probability for reaching consensus depends on the correlation between perspectives, and on their sophistication (mathematically captured by their dimensionality in the quantum model). Maximally uncorrelated sophisticated perspectives give the highest chance for opinion change, and hence for reaching consensus. With more than two citizens, multiple deliberation rounds with experts allow reaching consensus with significant probability. A first central lesson of this work is that, if one admits that opinions are contextual, the diversity of perspectives is beneficial, and even necessary, to overcome initial disagreement. One also learns that well-designed procedures managed by a facilitator are needed to increase the probability for consensus. An additional finding is that the richness of a thinking frame helps convergence towards consensus, and that the optimal facilitator's strategy entails focusing deliberation on a properly reduced problem.

Is Value Consensus Possible and How Is It Possible?

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Four Theses On the Issue of Value

The Research on the Construction of Campus Culture in Colleges and Universities under the Trend of Value Diversification

The Values Orientations of International Cultural-Studies Scholars

Cultural Diversity and Universal Values

Effects of Social Diversity on the Emergence of Global Consensus in Opinion Dynamics

Emergence Mechanisms of Group Consensus in Social Networks

A Consensus Value Approach for Influence Maximization in Social Networks

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

Chinese Values Vs. Liberalism: What Ideology Will Shape the International Normative Order?

Cross-issue solidarity and truth convergence in opinion dynamics

The Dynamics of Consensus Building in Intracultural and Intercultural Negotiations

Ideological Contradictions and Conflicts:Seeking Common Ground While Reserving Differences in International Community

Value Pluralism in the AI Ethics Debate – Different Actors, Different Priorities

Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? the Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values

Understanding China: A Dialogue with Philip Huang

Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus

A Few Theoretical Issues about the Construction of Socialist Core Value System

Deliberation Among Informed Citizens: The Value of Exploring Alternative Thinking Frames

Dialogue across Civilizations in the Age of Globalization and Pluralization