Dosimetric comparison with conventional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy to nasopharyngeal carcinoma

MA Xiu-mei,BAI Yong-rui,LI Li,WU Xu-dong,HOU Yan-li,CAO Hong-bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2007.12.019
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference between conventional radiation therapy(CRT) and intensity modulated radiation the-rapy(IMRT) to nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) patients by 3 dimensional treatment planning system(3DTPS). Methods Twelve NPC patients' treatment plans were designed as IMRT and CRT according to 3DTPS,respectively.The following values were measured,such as V95,D5%,D95%,D5%/D95%,Dmin,Dmax and Dmean of the target volume,and the D50,D33,D5,Dmax and Dmean of normal tissues.Results The dose coverage rate of PGTVnx,PGTVnd and PCTV1 in the IMRT plan were compared to CRT with no statistical difference.However,there was obvious difference in PCTV2 and some normal tissues. Conclusion Both IMRT and CRT have good coverage to primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes.IMRT can spare the temporomandibular joint,parotid,temporal lobe and pituitary from high dose irradiation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?