Comparative study of different sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Zhang Shudong,Li Hang,Ma Lulin,Xiao Chunlei,Zhuang Shenrong,Hou Xiaofei,Lu Jian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2013.04.013

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare the safety and efficiency of the F20 Peel-away plastic sheath and F24 standard metal sheath used in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods:A total of 66 patients who underwent PCNL for renal or ureteral calculi were enrolled,including 42 with the Wolf F24 standard metal sheath and 24 with the F20 percutane- ous renal sheath made by COOK company.Target renal calices were chosen and punctured under ultrasound guid- ance.Accesses were expanded with dilators and percutaneous renal accesses were established with Wolf F24 standard metal sheath or F20 plastic sheath.A Wolf F20.8 standard nephroscope was put in and Cyberwand double catheter lithotripsy system or EMS pneumatic lithotripsy was used to break stones.Details of every operation such as phase I stone-free rate,operative time and complications were recorded and analysed.Results:Percutaneous renal accesses were successfully established in all patients.The phase I stone-free rate of the two groups were 88.1%(37/42)and 87.5%(21/24)respectively(P>0.05).The mean operative time were(78.6±12.5)min and(73.4±9.2)min re- spectively(P>0.05).There were 6and 3cases with post-operative fever respectively(P>0.05).No blood transfu- sion cases occurred.Conclusions:There are no significant differences in phase I stone-free rate,operative time and complications between the F20 Peel-away plastic sheath and F24standard metal sheath.The F20.8standard nephro- scope can be put in F20 plastic sheath successfully.As a new method for percutaneous nephrolithotomy,the F20 plas- tic sheath allows removal of bigger stones and provides an access that is not easily lost and less likely to harm the kid- ney.