Embodied Technological Progress, Technology-Related Producer Inputs, And Regional Factors In A Firm-Level Model Of Growth

Shanzi Ke,Michael I. Luger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02108-6
IF: 2.438
1996-01-01
Regional Science and Urban Economics
Abstract:This paper employs a micro-based model using firm-level data to estimate the importance of embodied technological progress, technology-related producer inputs, and regional factors for production growth in the computer-electronics sector. We estimate the model using ordinary least squares with different specifications to test for returns-to-scale. Parameter values are used to estimate the contribution of several groups of inputs to output growth. Mostly, the signs and magnitudes of the empirical results conform to expectations. In addition, the growth of R&D investments significantly affects production growth. Moreover, firms' decision to keep their capital stock young by replacing older equipment frequently contributes significantly to production growth, largely because there is a negative relationship between the level of embodied technology and the age of capital. Similarly, technology embodied in labor, at least in terms of increases in the educational attainment (but not experience) of professionals, contributes to production growth. Finally, improvements in regions' 'milieu'-particularly in the levels of consumer services and regional amenities - affects production growth. Our measure of agglomeration economies (incorporating technological spillovers and localization effects) appears to exert a negative influence on production growth, signifying that congestion and other diseconomies associated with sector size in a given region more than offset the growth impulse for this sample. Growth in producer services does not seem to affect production growth, though the level presumably does.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?