Abstract:Autonomous lifelong development and learning is a fundamental capability of humans, differentiating them from current deep learning systems. However, other branches of artificial intelligence have designed crucial ingredients towards autonomous learning: curiosity and intrinsic motivation, social learning and natural interaction with peers, and embodiment. These mechanisms guide exploration and autonomous choice of goals, and integrating them with deep learning opens stimulating perspectives. Deep learning (DL) approaches made great advances in artificial intelligence, but are still far away from human learning. As argued convincingly by Lake et al., differences include human capabilities to learn causal models of the world from very little data, leveraging compositional representations and priors like intuitive physics and psychology. However, there are other fundamental differences between current DL systems and human learning, as well as technical ingredients to fill this gap, that are either superficially, or not adequately, discussed by Lake et al. These fundamental mechanisms relate to autonomous development and learning. They are bound to play a central role in artificial intelligence in the future. Current DL systems require engineers to manually specify a task-specific objective function for every new task, and learn through off-line processing of large training databases. On the contrary, humans learn autonomously open-ended repertoires of skills, deciding for themselves which goals to pursue or value, and which skills to explore, driven by intrinsic motivation/curiosity and social learning through natural interaction with peers. Such learning processes are incremental, online, and progressive. Human child development involves a progressive increase of complexity in a curriculum of learning where skills are explored, acquired, and built on each other, through particular ordering and timing. Finally, human learning happens in the physical world, and through bodily and physical experimentation, under severe constraints on energy, time, and computational resources. In the two last decades, the field of Developmental and Cognitive Robotics (Cangelosi and Schlesinger, 2015, Asada et al., 2009), in strong interaction with developmental psychology and neuroscience, has achieved significant advances in computational

Staged Competence Learning in Developmental Robotics.

Psychologically Inspired Sensory-Motor Development in Early Robot Learning

Growth of motor coordination in early robot learning

Learning to Collaborate from Simulation for Robot-Assisted Dressing

Developmental Learning for Autonomous Robots

A psychology based approach for longitudinal development in cognitive robotics

Developmental Robotics from Developmental Psychology

Novelty and habituation: the driving forces in early stage learning for developmental robotics

Learning to Scaffold the Development of Robotic Manipulation Skills

Construction of Robot Intra-modal and Inter-modal Coordination Skills by Developmental Learning

Chapter 1 ROBOT COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT BY CONSTRUCTIVE LEARNING

Stage-Wise Learning of Reaching Using Little Prior Knowledge

Autonomous development and learning in artificial intelligence and robotics: Scaling up deep learning to human--like learning

Robot Sensory-Motor Coordination Development and Its Adaptation

Perception-enhancement Based Task Learning and Action Scheduling for Robotic Limb in CPS Environment

A Computational Developmental Model of Perceptual Learning for Mobile Robot

Human-Robot Variable Impedance Skills Transfer Learning Based on Dynamic Movement Primitives

From Babies to Robots: The Contribution of Developmental Robotics to Developmental Psychology

Exploring CausalWorld: Enhancing robotic manipulation via knowledge transfer and curriculum learning

ADEL: Autonomous Developmental Evolutionary Learning for Robotic Manipulation

An Open-World Simulated Environment for Developmental Robotics