Single-incision Endoscope-Assisted Breast-Conserving Surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Prospective SINA-BCS Cohort Study
S. Lu,J. Yang,J. Chen,T. Wei,Q. Li,W. Yunhao,Z. Wang,H. Li,J. Wang,X. Wang,Q. Lv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad059
IF: 4.254
2023-01-01
The Breast
Abstract:due to improved cosmetic, and psychologic benefit.However, patients with ptotic breasts remain the main challenge for surgeons owing to the potential risk of postoperative complications Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) between March 2017 and November 2021.Patient demographics, incidence of complications, and quality of life assessed with BREAST-Q questionnaire were compared between the two different incisions (inverted-T for ptotic breasts vs. inframammary fold [IMF] for non ptotic).Results: A total of 102 patients were examined: 62 in the IMF cohort and 40 in the inverted-T cohort.The results demonstrated equivalence in safety metrics between the two groups, including hematoma ( p = .392),seroma ( p = .559),infection ( p = 1.00), skin necrosis ( p = 1.00), local recurrence ( p = 1.00), implant loss ( p = .279),capsular contracture ( p = 1.00), and nipple necrosis ( p = .082).Similarly, Breast-Q scores were equally high in both groups.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that inverted-T incision for ptotic breasts is a safe modality with similar complication rates and superior aesthetic results compared to IMF incision for non ptotic breasts.A higher rate of nipple necrosis in the inverted-T group, although not significant, should be considered for careful preoperative planning and patient selection.Prepectoral IBBR is a safe modality that should be considered for any patient, independent of breast size and ptosis grade, who are candidates for immediate IBBR.