311. Target-Specific Knockdown and Enhanced Anti-Tumor Outcome by an Oncolytic Virus- Delivered Small Interfering RNA (Sirna)

Alex W. Tong,Yu-An Zhang,Shirley Samuel,Patrick Chen,Yuqiao Shen,John Nemunaitis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.08.366
IF: 12.91
2006-01-01
Molecular Therapy
Abstract:Small interfering RNAs (siRNA) are small double stranded RNA molecules that mediate specific and highly potent post- transcriptional gene knockdown. siRNA-mediated knockdown of relevant genes resulted in tumor growth inhibition in a variety of human cancer cell types. However, clinical applicability of this technology has been hindered by the lack of an optimal delivery platform. We examined the use of the conditional replicative, oncolytic virus ONYX-411 to deliver an siRNA that knocks down the K-rasv-12 mutant oncogene overexpressed in many cancer cells. ONYX-411 carries an E1A deletion and E2F-1 conditional promoters in the E1 and E4 regions, hence limiting replication to cancer cells with a defective retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) pathway and E2F-1 overexpression. Viral oncolysis and replication lead to tumor cell reinfection, which is expected to amplify siRNA-knockdown effects. In proof-of-principle studies, we observed additive tumor growth inhibitory responses through siRNA-mediated K-ras knockdown and ONYX-411 infection. siRNA expression at the late infectious phase did not negatively impact viral replicative activity. A novel construct (Internavec) was generated by placing the K-rasv-12-specific siRNAras-4 hairpin construct under the control of endogenous, viral E3B late gene regulatory elements of ONYX-411. When tested against a panel of viral permissive human cancer lines (H79, H441, SW480, H522, H596), Internavec displayed a significantly elevated anti-tumor response (as compared with parental ONYX-411) only in host cells expressing the relevant K- rasv-12 mutation. The required Internavec dose (MOI of 1.03) for attaining 50% tumor cell growth inhibition (ED50) was 11-fold- lower than parental ONYX-411 (MOI of 11.6) and 14x lower than the control construct containing an siRNA against the green fluorescence protein (ONYX-411-siRNAGFP, MOI of 14.7). By comparison, Internavec remains attenuated in non-malignant HMEC cells. Hence the restricted viral activity within the tumor microenvironment can potentially serve to safeguard against previously reported "off target" siRNA effects. Daily intratumoral injections with Internavec (5 @ 1×108 pfu) significantly reduced H79 pancreatic cancer xenograft growth by 85.5 %, including complete growth suppression in 3 of 5 mice. Parental ONYX-411 or ONYX-411-siRNAGFP was markedly less effective (47.8% growth reduction, p=0.03; and 44.1% growth reduction, p=0.03, respectively). These findings indicate that Internavec can generate a two-pronged attack on tumor cells through oncogene knockdown and viral oncolysis, leading to significantly enhanced antitumor outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?