Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

On the Behavior Orientation of Government Intervention in Chinese Western Great Development

How to Avoid Growth Mania in Development during a Transitional Period

The Evolution of China Labor Market and Government Behavior

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

Beyond the Developmental State and the Transformation of Chinese State

Study On Transformation Of Government Functions In The Development Of China'S Land Market

Policy Gate,Wave Channels and Development Opportunities:A Theory of Optimal Government Intervention Degree from the Perspective of New Structural Economics

Dual Binary Transition and Structural Adjustment: Model,Propositions,and Evidence from China

Seizing the Initiative in Economic Growth:A theoretical hypothesis and case study of the Chinese local governments' strategies responding to the reformation of market economy

On Subjective Orientation of Development of the West in China

On dilemma and reforming path of government performance evaluation under inclusive development

System Reforms of Local Government and Regional Industry Transfer

The Government's Effect on Chinese Macroeconomic Vibration after Reform-opening up

On the Role of Government as a Function of Stage of Economic Development

On the government intervention organism in east Asia economic model

The dynamics of reform and development in China: A political economy perspective

Improvement of Market Access after China's Entry into WTO and the Orienation of Service-typeGovernment

A New Perspective of the Orientation of the Role of Government:Adjusting the Economic Role of Government from the Perspective of Developing Non - Governmental Economy

Great Turning: How Has the Chinese Economy Been Trapped in an Efficiency-And-Balance Tradeoff?

On Governmental Factors in the Transformation of Economic Development Mode

From Double Creation to Mutual Configuration——The Chinese Experience of Constructing Government-Market Relations