Abstract:Three γ/β-Ga2O3 nanoparticle catalysts that differ in the relative ratio of γ-Ga2O3 to β-Ga2O3 were prepared to evaluate the effect of H2 treatment (500 °C, 2 h) on the coordination environment of bulk and surface Ga sites, Lewis acidity and catalytic activity in propane dehydrogenation (PDH). Independent of the H2 treatment, the initial PDH activity of the γ/β-Ga2O3 catalysts increases with the fraction of the β-Ga2O3 phase. This is explained by the presence of weak Lewis acid sites (LAS) in β-Ga2O3 while such sites are absent in γ-Ga2O3. Treatment with H2 increases the catalytic activity of all three γ/β-Ga2O3 catalysts but for different reasons. For catalysts with higher fractions of β-Ga2O3, H2 treatment increases further the relative abundance of weak LAS, likely by generating coordinatively unsaturated Ga sites (such as tricoordinated Ga sites nearby oxygen vacancies). In contrast, H2 treatment of a catalyst containing a predominant fraction of γ-Ga2O3 phase induces disorder in the sub-surface structure of the nanoparticle, that is, it forms gallium and oxygen vacancies in the bulk and favors migration of gallium, and likely also of oxygen, to the surface. This induces a surface reconstruction that notably increases the fraction of strong LAS (and proportionally decreases the fraction of medium LAS), while creating no weak LAS in γ-Ga2O3-H2. Therefore, the increase in the catalytic activity of H2-treated γ-Ga2O3 is explained by the higher density of surface Ga sites in γ-Ga2O3-H2 relative to calcined γ-Ga2O3. H2-treated catalysts that contain a higher relative amount of weak LAS also feature a higher relative abundance of gallium hydride species associated with a low frequency FTIR band at ca. 1931–1939 cm−1, that is, weak LAS likely give weakly-bound hydrides in β-Ga2O3. Our results highlight that weak LAS in unsupported Ga2O3 catalysts are more active in PDH than mild or strong LAS.

Periodic Density Functional Theory Study of Propane Dehydrogenation over Perfect Ga2O3(100) Surface

Periodic density functional theory study of propane oxidative dehydrogenation over V2O5(001) surface.

Bulk and surface transformations of Ga2O3 nanoparticle catalysts for propane dehydrogenation induced by a H2 treatment

C-H Bond Activation of Propane on Ga2O22+ in Ga/H-ZSM-5 and Its Mechanistic Implications

Support Effect in Dehydrogenation of Propane in the Presence of Co2 over Supported Gallium Oxide Catalysts

Effects of Ga Doping on Pt/CeO2‐Al2O3 Catalysts for Propane Dehydrogenation

Ethane Dehydrogenation on Single and Dual Centers of Ga-modified γ-Al 2 O 3

Dehydrogenation of propane to propene in the presence of CO2over gallium oxide

Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propene over Different Polymorphs of Gallium Oxide

Subsurface-Regulated PtGa Nanoparticles Confined in Silicalite-1 for Propane Dehydrogenation

Reversible Transformation of Sub-nanometer Ga-based Clusters to Isolated [4]Ga(4Si) Sites Creates Active Centers for Propane Dehydrogenation

Understanding The Correlation Between Ga Speciation And Propane Dehydrogenation Activity On Ga/H-Zsm-5 Catalysts

Dual-function catalysis in propane dehydrogenation over Pt<sub>1</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst: Insights from a microkinetic analysis

A DFT Study on Surface Dependence of Β-Ga2o3 for CO2 Hydrogenation to CH3OH

Promoting propane dehydrogenation with CO2 over Ga2O3/SiO2 by eliminating Ga-hydrides

Propane Dehydrogenation Using Platinum Supported on Gallium-Doped Silica

Ga2O22+ Stabilized by Paired Framework Al Atoms in MFI: A Highly Reactive Site in Nonoxidative Propane Dehydrogenation

The Nature of the Isolated Gallium Active Center for Propane Dehydrogenation on Ga/SiO2

Dehydrogenation of propane over spinel-type gallia–alumina solid solution catalysts

Kinetics of Propane Dehydrogenation Based on Density Functional Theory

Atomic layer deposition of Ga2O3 on γ-Al2O3 catalysts with higher interactions and improved activity and propylene selectivity in CO2-assisted oxidative dehydrogenation of propane