A Survey on Design Rationale: Representation, Capture and Retrieval
Xiaochun Hu,Jun Pang,Yan Pang,Michael Atwood,Wei Sun,William C. Regli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2000/dfm-14008
2000-01-01
Abstract:Abstract This paper provides a brief survey on recent research in the area of design rationale. The study of Design Rationale spans a number of diverse disciplines, touching on concepts from research communities in Mechanical Design, Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Civil Engineering and Human-Factors and Human-Computer Interaction research. We focus this survey on prototype design rationale systems for these application domains and put forward several major axes along which to describe and classify design rationale systems, including argumentation-based, descriptive, and process-based approaches. Further, we attempt to abstract the place of systems and tools for design rationale capture and retrieval in the context of contemporary knowledge-based engineering and CAD tools. This survey is structured around the fundamental different approaches, their representation schema, their capture methods, and retrieval techniques. A number of recent design rationale systems and representation schemes are presented, including JANUS, COMET, ADD, REMAP, HOS, PHIDIAS, DRIVE, IBIS. We conclude with an assessment of the current state-of-the-art and a discussion of critical open research issues.