Is the Number of Giant Arcs in Acdm Consistent with Observations?

GL Li,S Mao,YP Jing,M Bartelmann,X Kang,M Meneghetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/497583

2005-01-01

Abstract:We use high-resolution N-body simulations to study the galaxy-cluster cross sections and the abundance of giant arcs in the Lambda CDM model. Clusters are selected from the simulations using the friends-of-friends method, and their cross sections for forming giant arcs are analyzed. The background sources are assumed to follow a uniform ellipticity distribution from 0 to 0.5 and to have an area identical to a circular source with diameter 1". We find that the optical depth scales as the source redshift approximately as tau(1") = 2.25 x 10(-6)/[1 + (z(s)/3.14)(-3.42)] (0.6 < z(s) < 7). The amplitude is about 50% higher for an effective source diameter of 0".5. The optimal lens redshift for giant arcs with the length-to-width (L/W) ratio larger than 10 increases from 0.3 for z(s) = 1, to 0.5 for z(s) = 2, and to 0.7 - 0.8 for z(s) > 3. The optical depth is sensitive to the source redshift, in qualitative agreement with Wambsganss et al. ( 2004). However, our overall optical depth appears to be only similar to 10% - 70% of those from previous studies. The differences can be mostly explained by the different power spectrum normalizations (sigma(8)) used and different ways of determining the L/W ratio. Finite source size and ellipticity have modest effects on the optical depth. We also found that the number of highly magnified (with magnification vertical bar mu vertical bar > 10) and "undistorted'' images (with L/W < 3) is comparable to the number of giant arcs with vertical bar mu vertical bar > 10 and L/W > 10. We conclude that our predicted rate of giant arcs may be lower than the observed rate, although the precise "discrepancy'' is still unclear due to uncertainties in both theory and observations.