Abstract:Protein folding energetics can be determined experimentally on a case‐by‐case basis but it is not understood in sufficient detail to provide deep control in protein design. The fundamentals of protein stability have been outlined by calorimetry, protein engineering, and biophysical modeling, but these approaches still face great difficulty in elucidating the specific contributions of the intervening molecules and physical interactions. Recently, we have shown that the enthalpy and heat capacity changes associated to the protein folding reaction can be calculated within experimental error using molecular dynamics simulations of native protein structures and their corresponding unfolded ensembles. Analyzing in depth molecular dynamics simulations of four model proteins (CI2, barnase, SNase, and apoflavodoxin), we dissect here the energy contributions to ΔH (a key component of protein stability) made by the molecular players (polypeptide and solvent molecules) and physical interactions (electrostatic, van der Waals, and bonded) involved. Although the proteins analyzed differ in length, isoelectric point and fold class, their folding energetics is governed by the same quantitative pattern. Relative to the unfolded ensemble, the native conformations are enthalpically stabilized by comparable contributions from protein–protein and solvent–solvent interactions, and almost equally destabilized by interactions between protein and solvent molecules. The native protein surface seems to interact better with water than the unfolded one, but this is outweighed by the unfolded surface being larger. From the perspective of physical interactions, the native conformations are stabilized by van de Waals and Coulomb interactions and destabilized by conformational strain arising from bonded interactions. Also common to the four proteins, the sign of the heat capacity change is set by interactions between protein and solvent molecules or, from the alternative perspective, by Coulomb interactions.

Do Prokaryotes Have More Kinetically Stable Proteins Than Eukaryotic Organisms?

Proteomics Analyses of Kinetic Stability: from Molecular to Organism Longevity

Proteomics Analysis Of Kinetically Stable Proteins

Biological Roles of Protein Hyperstability: Implications for Biotechnology

Biological Roles of Protein Kinetic Stability.

Proteomics-Level Identification of Degradation-Resistant Proteins Provide Insight about Their Potential Roles in Organismal Adaptation to Stress

Protein and Enzyme Stability: Structural, Thermodynamic, and Experimental Aspects

Quantifying the Kinetic Stability of Hyperstable Proteins Via Time-Dependent SDS Trapping

Identifying the Subproteome of Kinetically Stable Proteins Via Diagonal 2D SDS/PAGE.

Proteins with High Structural Similarity Can Have Different Mechanical Unfolding Behaviors

Weak, specific chemical interactions dictate barnase stability in diverse cellular environments

Resolving the Enthalpy of Protein Stabilization by Macromolecular Crowding

The Folding Transition State of Protein L is Extensive with Nonnative Interactions (and Not Small and Polarized)

Protein stability governed by its structural plasticity is inferred by physicochemical factors and salt bridges

Stabilizing Effect of Inherent Knots on Proteins Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Universal protein misfolding intermediates can bypass the proteostasis network and remain soluble and less functional

In situ analysis of osmolyte mechanisms of proteome thermal stabilization

Identifying Kinetically Stable Proteins with Capillary Electrophoresis.

Designed protein reveals structural determinants of extreme kinetic stability.

Energy, water, and protein folding: A molecular dynamics‐based quantitative inventory of molecular interactions and forces that make proteins stable

Macromolecular crowding and preferential exclusion counteract the effect of protein denaturant: Biophysical aspects