Abstract:Abstract Background Telephone interviews have become established as an alternative to traditional mail surveys for collecting epidemiological data in public health research. However, the use of telephone and mail surveys raises the question of to what extent the results of different data collection methods deviate from one another. We therefore set out to study possible differences in using telephone and mail survey methods to measure health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. Methods A total of 1700 German children aged 8-18 years and their parents were interviewed randomly either by telephone or by mail. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and mental health problems (MHP) were assessed using the KINDL-R Quality of Life instrument and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) children's self-report and parent proxy report versions. Mean Differences ("d" effect size) and differences in Cronbach alpha were examined across modes of administration. Pearson correlation between children's and parents' scores was calculated within a multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM) analysis and compared across survey modes using Fisher-Z transformation. Results Telephone and mail survey methods resulted in similar completion rates and similar socio-demographic and socio-economic makeups of the samples. Telephone methods resulted in more positive self- and parent proxy reports of children's HRQoL (SMD ≤ 0.27) and MHP (SMD ≤ 0.32) on many scales. For the phone administered KINDL, lower Cronbach alpha values (self/proxy Total: 0.79/0.84) were observed (mail survey self/proxy Total: 0.84/0.87). KINDL MTMM results were weaker for the phone surveys: mono-trait-multi-method mean r = 0.31 (mail: r = 0.45); multi-trait-mono-method mean (self/parents) r = 0.29/0.36 (mail: r = 0.34/0.40); multi-trait-multi-method mean r = 0.14 (mail: r = 0.21). Weaker MTMM results were also observed for the phone administered SDQ: mono-trait-multi-method mean r = 0.32 (mail: r = 0.40); multi-trait-mono-method mean (self/parents) r = 0.24/0.30 (mail: r = 0.20/0.32); multi-trait-multi-method mean r = 0.14 (mail = 0.14). The SDQ classification into borderline and abnormal for some scales was affected by the method (OR = 0.36-1.55). Conclusions The observed differences between phone and mail surveys are small but should be regarded as relevant in certain settings. Therefore, while both methods are valid, some changes are necessary. The weaker reliability and MTMM validity associated with phone methods necessitates improved phone adaptations of paper and pencil questionnaires. The effects of phone versus mail survey modes are partly different across constructs/measures.

Comparison of Mail and Meeting Forms in Evaluation of Delphi Study

Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies

[Development of Datasets for Basic Medical Information System].

Systematic review of the Delphi method application in clinical medical education of China

On the post competency evaluation system of general practitioners based on Delphi method

Study on applying Delphi Method for screening indicator system of public health dissemination material

The Reserch on the Evaluation System for Community Health Service Centers

Comparing the Methods on Determining the Index and Weight of the Social Welfare in Public Medical Institutions

Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response

Comparison of assessment via an index system and subjective assessment by experts in evaluating doctors' scientific research performance

Model Construction of Medical Endoscope Service Evaluation System-Based on the Analysis of Delphi Method

A Comparative Research in Problems Existing in Community Health Service

Effects of phone versus mail survey methods on the measurement of health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents

A Conjoint Analysis of Preferences on Medical Endoscope After-sales Service

A Pilot Study in the Use of the Delphi Method to Document Conference Proceedings: Comparison of the Rate of Consensus Among Attending and Nonattending Participants

Establishing the Criteria in Repeated Usage of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines by Modified Delphi

Improving Delphi Process in Acupuncture Decision Making: Overall Descriptions and Quality Assessment of Delphi Reports

Study on the Evaluation System of Vocational Aptitude for Nurses

A Study on Establishment of Examination Criteria for the Clinical Practice of Dental Students in the Department of Prosthodontics by Delphi Method

A Methodological Study to Compare Alternative Modes of Administration With Value EQ-5D Using Preference-Elicitation Techniques

The Scientific Evaluation Standard of Medical Articles for Public: a Delphi Study