Abstract:The goal of this study was to validate accuracy and reproducibility of a new 2D/3D reconstruction-based program called “HipRecon” for determining cup orientation after THA. “HipRecon” uses a statistical shape model based 2D/3D deformable registration technique that can reconstruct a patient-specific 3D model from a single standard AP pelvic X-ray radiograph. Required inputs include a digital radiograph, the pixel size, and the film-to-source distance. No specific calibration of the X-ray, or a CAD (computer-assisted design) model of the implant, or a CT-scan of the patient is required. Cup orientation is then calculated with respect to the anterior pelvic plane that is derived from the reconstructed 3D-model. The validation study was conducted on datasets of 29 patients (31 hips). Among them, there were 15 males and 14 females. Each dataset has one post-operative X-ray radiograph and one post-operative CT-scan. The post-operative CT scan for each patient was used to establish the ground truth for the cup orientation. Radiographs with deep centering (7 radiographs), or of pelvises with fractures (2 radiographs), or with both (1 radiograph), or of non-hemispherely shaped cup (1 radiograph) were assessed separately from the radiographs without above mentioned phenomena (18 radiographs) to estimate a potential influence on the 2D/3D reconstruction accuracy. To make the description easier, we denote those radiographs with above mentioned phenomena as non-normal cases and those without as normal cases. The cup anteversions and inclinations that were calculated by “HipRecon” were compared to the associated ground truth. To validate the reproducibility and the reliability, one observer conducted twice measurements for each dataset using “HipRecon”. The mean accuracy for the normal cases was 0.4° ± 1.8° (−2.6° to 3.3°) for inclination and 0.6° ± 1.5° (−2.0° to 3.9°) for anteversion, and the mean accuracy for the non-normal cases was 2.3° ± 2.4° (−2.1° to 6.3°) for inclination and 0.1° ± 2.8° (−4.6° to 5.1°) for anteversion. Comparing the measurement from the normal radiographs to those from the non-normal radiographs using the Mann-Whitney U-test, we found a significant difference in measuring cup inclination (p = 0.01) but not in measuring cup anteversion (p = 0.3). Bland-Altman analysis of those measurements from the normal cases indicated that no systematical error was detected for “HipRecon,” as the mean of the measurement pairs were spread evenly and randomly for both inclination and anteversion. “HipRecon” showed a very good reproducibility for both parameters with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inclination of 0.98 (95% Confidence Limits (CL): 0.96–0.99) and for anteversion of 0.96 (95% CL: 0.91–0.98). Accurate assessment of the acetabular cup orientation is important for evaluation of outcome after THA, but the inability to measure acetabular cup orientation accurately limits one9s ability to determine optimal cup orientations, to assess new treatment methods of improving acetabular cup orientation in surgery, and to correlate the acetabular cup orientation to osteolysis, wear, and instability. In this study, we showed that “HipRecon” was an accurate, consistent, and reproducible technique to measure cup orientation from post-operative X-ray radiographs. Furthermore, our experimental results indicated that the best results were achieved with the radiographs of non-fractured pelvises that included the anterior superior iliac spines and the cranial part of the non-fractured pelvis. Thus, it is recommended that these landmarks should be included in the radiograph whenever the 2D/3D reconstruction-based method will be used

Robust Intensity-Based 3D-2D Registration of Ct and X-Ray Images for Precise Estimation of Cup Alignment after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Precise Estimation of Postoperative Cup Alignment from Single Standard X-Ray Radiograph with Gonadal Shielding

Statistically Deformable 2D/3D Registration for Estimating Post-operative Cup Orientation from a Single Standard AP X-ray Radiograph

Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D–3D image registration

Assessing the Accuracy Factors in the Determination of Postoperative Acetabular Cup Orientation Using Hybrid 2D–3D Registration

HipMatch: An object-oriented cross-platform program for accurate determination of cup orientation using 2D–3D registration of single standard X-ray radiograph and a CT volume

Validation of a New Method for Determination of Cup Orientation in THA.

HIPMATCH: A 2D-3D MATCHING SOFTWARE – ACCURATE AND RELIABLE

Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging

Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA

VALIDATION OF A NEW 2D/3D RECONSTRUCTION-BASED PROGRAM FOR DETERMINATION OF CUP ORIENTATION AFTER THA

Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging

A995. ACCURACY OF CT-BASED COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Value of Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Pre-operative Planning in Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Dysplastic Acetabulum.

3D simulation of radiographic projections to test and reduce the effect of pelvic tilt on the accuracy of cross-table lateral radiography

Evaluating Alternative Registration Planes in Imageless, Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems for Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Plan in 2D, execute in 3D: An augmented reality solution for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty

Measurement of the Acetabular Cup Orientation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on 3-Dimensional Reconstruction From a Single X-Ray Image Using Generative Adversarial Networks

Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study

Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross‐table Lateral Radiograph Method