Prognosis of limited stage classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: A report of 40 cases
Yan XIE,Wen ZHENG,Xiaopei WANG,Ningjing LIN,Meifeng TU,Lingyan PING,Lijuan DENG,Chen ZHANG,Weiping LIU,Yuqin SONG,Jun ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2018.33.017
2018-01-01
Tumori
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with limited stage classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). Methods: Clinical data of 40 patients with limited stage cHL treated in Department of Lymphoma of Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2012 to May 2014 were reviewed. Results: The media age of the 40 patients with cHL was 34 years old (range: 15-62 years). Of these patients, 39 patients received chemotherapy with ABVD regimen, one patient received chemotherapy with escalated BEACOPP regimen. Fourteen patients received local radiotherapy after chemotherapy. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, the positron emission computerized tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) (interim PET-CT, iPET-CT) was conducted for all patients to evaluate the treatment response. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of iPET-CT decreased more than 71% as compared with that before treatment was considered negative. The results showed that 33 (82.5%) patients were negative and 7 (17.5%) were positive. The median follow- up period was 48 months (range: 36-77 months). The 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) rate and progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 97.1 % and 97.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis of prognosis showed that only iPET-CT result was associated with OS (P = 0.031) and PFS (P = 0.011), and other factors including age,B-symptom, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), bulky, with or without European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk factors, and with or without radiotherapy were not associated with OS and PFS. Conclusion: The treatment outcomes of patients with limited stage cHL are favourable, iPET- CT results might predict the prognosis. Radiotherapy might be omitted for some patients. However, further well designed prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the results of this retrospective study.