Depths to the Magnetic Layer Bottom in the South China Sea Area and Their Tectonic Implications

Chun-Feng Li,Xiaobin Shi,Zuyi Zhou,Jiabiao Li,Jianhua Geng,Bing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04702.x
IF: 3.352
2010-01-01
Geophysical Journal International
Abstract:P>The depths to the magnetic layer bottom (Z(b)) in the South China Sea (SCS) area are estimated by computing radially averaged amplitude spectra of total field magnetic anomalies. We test different sizes of moving windows in which the spectra are calculated to better understand how window sizes affect the depth estimations. Apart from lowering the resolutions of estimated Z(b), larger windows do not necessarily incur presumable increases in Z(b) in the SCS area. Although the centroid method is taken as our primary technique for estimating Z(b), for cross check, the spectral peak and the non-linear inversion methods are also applied to those windows where spectral peaks do appear. In a single window we may find discrepancy in Z(b) estimated from different techniques, but for all windows showing spectral peaks, the estimated Z(b) from one technique are grossly correlated with those from another. Our results show that most parts of the central SCS ocean basin and the northern continent-ocean transition (COT) zone have significantly smaller Z(b) than the surrounding continental blocks. In the surrounding continental regions Z(b) are averaged at about 34 km, a depth close to the Moho depth. The average Z(b) is about 22 km in the central basin, but this value is much larger than the Moho depth, signifying that the uppermost 10 km or so of the mantle beneath the central basin is also magnetized. The strong faulting and recent magmatism within the COT zone can account for the small Z(b) near the northern continental margin. The estimated Z(b) are also found very correlative to surface heat flow. This observation verifies dominant contributions to surface heat flow from incoming mantle heat flow due to thermal conduction. The positive correlations observed among Z(b) from different techniques as well as the good correlation between surface heat flow and Z(b) support the reasoning that our estimated Z(b) are within an acceptable range of accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?