Abstract:Past research on decisions under risk has documented two contradictory context effects: the contrast effect, where risk preferences in "target" tasks diverge from those in previous "surrounding" tasks, and the assimilation effect that implies the opposite bias. We present four web experiments (three preregistered) that clarify the conditions determining the relative prominence of these opposing effects. Our experiments focus on choice patterns in "target" tasks where participants choose between the status quo and a risky mixed gamble with an expected value of zero. Study 1 examines the impact of surroundings that differ from the target task with respect to the expected benefit from risk‐taking. The findings reveal a strong contrast effect: Decreasing the attractiveness of risk‐taking in the surrounding tasks increased the risk‐taking rate in the target tasks from 53.2% to 79.7%. Study 2 investigates the impact of surroundings that differ in the payoff domain. The findings indicate a strong assimilation effect: Decreasing the attractiveness of risk‐taking in the surrounding tasks decreased the risk‐taking rate in the target tasks from 74.7% to 36.5%. Additionally, the results revealed unpredicted and robust reversed loss aversion patterns which Studies 3 and 4 further clarify. Our findings (1) suggest that the isolated within‐task computations assumed by leading descriptive models overlook substantial contextual considerations, (2) clarify the factors determining the impact of the contrast and assimilation effects in decisions under risk, and (3) provide a theoretical framework for making useful predictions in various scenarios.

Can Group Decision-making Control the Tendency of Escalating Commitment——An Experimental Research Based on Prospect Theory

An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurs' Escalation of Commitment

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

The Influence Of Epistemic Motivation On Shared Mental Model In Group Decision Making

The Influence of Superordinate Identity on Group Decision Making Through Discussion

Powerful or Powerless when Change is Needed: Effects of Power on Escalation of Commitment

Study on Commitment Escalation Based on the Self-esteem Level of Decision-makers and the Sunk Cost of a Program

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

Are decisions under risk malleable?

Study On The Control Of Escalation Of Commitment

Staying the course: Decision makers who escalate commitment are trusted and trustworthy.

Research on the evolutionary game of safety behavior of EPC consortium members based on prospect theory

A prospect theory-based three-way decision model

Attoliter Chemistry for Nanoscale Functionalization of Graphene.

Dynamic Decision-Making under Simulated Realistic Risk Situations

New Paradigms for the Old Question: Challenging the Expectation Rule Held by Risky Decision-Making Theories

Culture, Thinking Styles and Investment Decision.

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Escalation bias among technology entrepreneurs: the moderating effects of motivation and mental budgeting

Prevalence of IgG antibodies to Trichinella spiralis in dogs in Macedonia, northern Greece.

Player-Spectator Discrepancies on Risk Preference During Decision Making