A clinicopathologic study of 88 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands

SHI Lu,CHEN Xin-ming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X2013.03.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the prognostic importance of Auclair’s quantitative grading system of mucoepidermoid carcinoma(MEC) of salivary gland.Methods: Eighty-eight MEC of salivary glands were clinicopathologically reviewed.Auclair’s quantitative grading system was used.Clinical and pathologic features were statistically analyzed.Results: Thirty-four cases(38.6%) were classified as low grade,20(22.7%) as intermediate grade and 34(38.6%) as high-grade tumors.Patients with high grade tumors were older on average than those with low grade tumors [(43.7 ±17) vs(33.9 ± 13.9) ],P < 0.05.The incidence of clinical symptom of low grade tumors(21%) was lower than that of intermediate(50%) and high grade tumors(76%)(P < 0.05).Tumor sizes of high grade tumors(3.8 ± 1.4) cm were larger than those of low(2.9 ± 1.8) cm and intermediate grade tumors(3.5 ± 2.9) cm(P < 0.05).Survival analysis revealed that gender,clinical stage and pathologic grade were the major recurrence risk factors(P < 0.05).Conclusion: In MEC of salivary glands,tumor grade,subdividing cases into low,intermediate and high grade by using the criteria delineated by Auclair,correlates well with prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?