Level Ⅵ and Ⅱ-Ⅴ cervical lymph node metastasis in differentiated thyroid carcinoma

LI Zhen-dong,DONG Hui-lei,LI Shu-chun,FU Wen-chao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1673-0860.2007.12.008
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the characters of the cervical lymph node metastasis in differentiated thyroid carcinoma,and to provide evidence for proper surgery of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.Methods From 1984 to 2000,99 cases with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were performed thyroidectomy and neck dissection.The patients were followed up.A retrospective analysis was performed. Results In 99 cases with differentiated thyroid carcinoma,there were 61 papillary carcinoma,13 papillary and follicular mixed carcinoma,25 follicular carcinoma.According to 2002 UICC TNM classification,60 cases were staged Ⅰ,1 case staged Ⅱ,5 cases staged Ⅲ,33 cases staged Ⅳ.Lobectomy and isthmectomy was performed in 80 cases,lobectomy was resected and opposite subtotal lobectomy in 15 cases,total thyroidectomy in 4 cases.One hundred and four neck dissection were performed in 99 cases(5 cases were bilateral neck dissection).Among them,66(68 sides)were radical neck dissection,33(36 sides)were modified neck dissection.Pathological results showed that lymph nodes were positive in 86 sides of 83 cases. The rate of cervical lymph node metastasis was 83.8%(83/99).The positive rates of lymph node were 37.5%(39/104)in level Ⅳ and 76.9%(80/104)in Ⅱ-Ⅴ,which was statistically different(X~2=33.01, P<0.01).The cervical lymph node metastasis in lateral area(level Ⅱ-Ⅴ)and that in Ⅵ had not relationship(X~2=2.08,P>0.05).Ten and 15 year survival rates of all 99 cases were 88.3 % and 84.5 % respectively.Conclusions The occurrence of lymph node metastasis in level Ⅵ and level Ⅱ-Ⅴ was different and no relationship.One can not judge whether lateral neck metastasis by the lymph node statue in level Ⅵ only.Although they all had good prognosis,patients with positive nodes in level Ⅵ were not worse than that in lateral neck(Ⅱ-Ⅴ).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?