Exploring the regional ecological security evaluation methods based on values:A case study in the energy region of northern Shaanxi

REN Zhiyuan,LIU Yanxu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201310001
2013-01-01
Geographical Research
Abstract:Research on regional ecological security is of great significance in realizing regional sustainable development. However, there are rare studies which can not only synchronously guarantee temporal and spatial precisions but also involve enough evaluation indices at present. Based on the replacement of values, this study adopts a part of the ecological estimation models as examples to distinguish the ecosystem services and eco-risks.Then it analyses the feasibility and rationality for using the ratio of value to express the ecological security degree in a specific area. And the partitions are considered to be more comprehensive than directly zoning by ecological security degree. The analysis of the specific examples in the research shows that:(1) the ecosystem services value and eco-risk loss value are not consistent in the time variation. Under the background of ecological restoration in northern Shaanxi, the tendency of ecological system security degree on the graph is not presented as a straight line. The result shows that human activities and climate changes have complex interactions in the geographical- ecological process.(2) The result of evaluation is focused on the description of ecological security degree with the view of human development. So it is suitable to analyze the ecological processes which are influenced by human activities. The calculation method in this study can reduce the uncertainty produced by marking the weight on the indices, as well as provide a high temporal and spatial precision.By using a variety of year scales or other remote sensing image data of high resolution to guarantee the accuracy, and applying specific models to concrete the composite index, this research contributes to describe the specific spatial pattern and time process reflected by the index, while it still guarantees the geography or ecology meaning at the same time. However,as there is still much room for improving ecological estimation models, the uncertainty has not been eliminated. Further studies on a cross-reference evaluation on multi-scale and multi-methods are needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?