Abstract:Random Forests have been one of the most popular bagging methods in the past few decades, especially due to their success at handling tabular datasets. They have been extensively studied and compared to boosting models, like XGBoost, which are generally considered more performant. Random Forests adopt several simplistic assumptions, such that all samples and all trees that form the forest are equally important for building the final model. We introduce Enhanced Random Forests, an extension of vanilla Random Forests with extra functionalities and adaptive sample and model weighting. We develop an iterative algorithm for adapting the training sample weights, by favoring the hardest examples, and an approach for finding personalized tree weighting schemes for each new sample. Our method significantly improves upon regular Random Forests across 15 different binary classification datasets and considerably outperforms other tree methods, including XGBoost, when run with default hyperparameters, which indicates the robustness of our approach across datasets, without the need for extensive hyperparameter tuning. Our tree-weighting methodology results in enhanced or comparable performance to the uniformly weighted ensemble, and is, more importantly, leveraged to define importance scores for trees based on their contributions to classifying each new sample. This enables us to only focus on a small number of trees as the main models that define the outcome of a new sample and, thus, to partially recover interpretability, which is critically missing from both bagging and boosting methods. In binary classification problems, the proposed extensions and the corresponding results suggest the equivalence of bagging and boosting methods in performance, and the edge of bagging in interpretability by leveraging a few learners of the ensemble, which is not an option in the less explainable boosting methods.

Improving the Performance of Boosting for Naive Bayesian Classification

A Study of AdaBoost with Naive Bayesian Classifiers: Weakness and Improvement.

A Technique For Improving The Performance Of Naive Bayes Text Classification

Effective Boosting of Naïve Bayesian Classifiers by Local Accuracy Estimation

A Method to Boost Naïve Bayesian Classifiers

Boosting Naive Bayesian Learning

Locally Weighted Learning: How and when Does It Work in Bayesian Networks?

A PERFORMANCE PREDICTION METHOD BASED ON NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFICATION

Analysis of NIR Using Boosting Algorithm

for Further Innproving the Performance of Decision Tree Learning

Boosting Trees for Cost-Sensitive Classifications.

Improving The Performance Of Decision Tree: A Hybrid Approach

Lazy Bayesian Rules: A Lazy Semi-Naive Bayesian Learning Technique Competitive to Boosting Decision Trees

An Improved FloatBoost Algorithm for Naïve Bayes Text Classification.

Integrating Boosting and Stochastic Attribute Selection Committees for Further Improving the Performance of Decision Tree Learning

Improving Naive Bayes Classifier by Dividing Its Decision Regions

Boosting Local Naïve Bayesian Rules

Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm

An improved floatboost algorithm for Naïve bayes text classification

Binary Classification: Is Boosting stronger than Bagging?

Structure Extension of Tree-Augmented Naive Bayes