~(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis and evaluation of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma

LIU Jian-ye,QIN Zi-ke,LI Yong-hong,HAN Hui,LIU Zhuo-wei,FAN Wei,WU Pei-Hong,YAO Kai,ZHANG Zhi-ling,JIANG Li-juan,XU Zhen-zhou,ZHOU Fang-jian
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To retrospectively evaluate the diagnosis of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with UTUC suspected undergoing intravenous urography (IVU), helical computerized tomography (CT) and 18F-FDG-PET/CT before any surgery, intervention or treatment from April 2000 to December 2010. Final diagnosis of UTUC was confirmed by surgical pathology results. Relationships between the diagnostic accuracy and various diagnostic tools, including 18F-FDG-PET/CT were analyzed. Results 26 patients (89.7%) had a positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT study, which were confirmed by surgical pathology for UTUC. The sensitivity and specificity of IVU were 64.0%, 75.0%, respectively, and 75.0%, 80.0% for helical CT. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT were 92.9%, 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT was significantly to CT and IVU in 29 patients (P=0.041 vs CT, P=0.036 vs IVU). And the specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT was significantly higher compared to CT and IVU in 29 patients (P=0.041 vs CT, P=0.036 vs IVU). Conclusions 18F-FDG-PET/CT is more sensitive and specific than IVU and helical CT in the diagnosis of UTUC. The 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a useful modality for the diagnosis of UTUC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?