Therapeutic effects and safety of apatinib mesylate on patients with gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis in SOX scheme
H-F Wang,H-H Wang,X-J Ye,W-J Wang,L-S Teng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202307_33133
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic values of serum tumor markers in gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis and the therapeutic efficacy as well as safety of apatinib mesylate combined with Geo+Oxaliplatin (SOX) scheme treatment in gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis. Patients and methods: Sixty patients with gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis and 11 patients without gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis were selected as the research subjects. The levels of serum tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, CA211, CA242, CA724, and CA19-9] and abdominal irrigating solution exosome [micro ribonucleic acid (miR)-21 and miR-320c] and the differences in their diagnostic values were compared and analyzed. The patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases are then divided into two groups, one for control (30 cases receiving just SOX scheme treatment) and the other for the experiment (30 cases receiving SOX scheme treatment plus apatinib mesylate). Besides, the differences in serum tumor marker level, therapeutic efficacy, overall survival (OS), complication rating, and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core-30 (QLQ-C30) score among patients after treatment were compared. Results: Demonstrated that serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, CA211, CA242, CA724, and CA19-9 levels of patients in the transfer group were remarkably enhanced compared with those of patients in the non-transfer group, and the levels of abdominal irrigating solution exosome (miR-21 and miR-320c) were reduced compared with those in non-transfer group (p<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnosis of gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis by each index were 0.553, 0.880, 0.832, 0.619, 0.863, 0.651, 0.918, and 0.903, respectively. Patients in the experimental group's serum levels of CEA, CA125, CA211, CA242, CA724, and CA19-9 were noticeably lower after therapy compared to those in the control group, and their median OS was also noticeably longer (p<0.05). After treatment, the objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the control group and experimental group amounted to 6.7% vs. 30.0% and 50.0% vs. 86.7%, respectively. ORR and DCR of the experimental group were notably higher (p<0.05). Between the patients in the control group and the experimental group, there were no glaring variations in the frequency of problems (hypertension, nausea, vomiting, bone marrow suppression, hand-foot syndrome, and leucopenia) (p>0.05). The cognitive function, emotional function, and life health scores of patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p<0.05), which suggested that serum tumor markers and miR-21 as well as miR-320c showed high diagnostic efficiency in gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis. Conclusions: Apatinib mesylate combined with SOX scheme treatment was more effective in treating gastric carcinoma peritoneal metastasis and possessed the same safety as single SOX scheme treatment. Hence, it is worthy of clinical promotion.