Advantages of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF Versus Rhg-Csf in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Multiple Cycles of Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy: an Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase Ⅲ Study.
Jie Xie,Jun Cao,Zhonghua Wang,Biyun Wang,Sheng Zhang,Leiping Wang,Jian Zhang,Zhonghua Tao,Ting Li,JinFeng Zhang,Xi-Chun Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e14043
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e14043 Background: PEG-modification recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and improves the safety of chemotherapy. In China's registration trial of PEG-rhG-CSF, we assessed its efficacy and safety against conventional recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in breast cancer patients, and prospectively explored its value over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Methods: In this open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 study, breast cancer patients (n = 569) were randomized to receive 100 µg/kg subcutaneous (s.c.) PEG-rhG-CSF, fixed 6 mg s.c. PEG-rhG-CSF or daily 5 µg/kg/d s.c. rhG-CSF 48 hours after chemotherapy.The primary endpoints were the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycles 2 to 4, the incidence of febrile neutropenia and the safety. Results: For the primary endpoints, a once-per-cycle PEG-rhG-CSF at either 100 µg/kg or fixed 6 mg was not significantly different from daily injections of rhG-CSF for either incidence or duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Interestingly, a substantial difference was noted during cycle 2 regarding incidence or duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia, and the difference became bigger over cycles 3 and 4, reaching a statistical significance at cycle 4 in either incidence (P = 0.0309) or duration (P = 0.0289) of grade 3/4 neutropenia favoring PEG-rhG-CSF. A significant trend towards a lower incidence of all-grade adverse events with PEG-rhG-CSF was noted at 129 (68.98%), 142 (75.53%) and 160 (82.47%) in arms of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg, fixed 6 mg and rhG-CSF, respectively (P = 0.0085). The corresponding incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events was 2/187 (1.07%), 1/188 (0.53%) and 8/194 (4.12%), respectively (P = 0.0477). Conclusions: Compared with rhG-CSF, PEG-rhG-CSF is a more safe and convenient formulation, and more effective prophylactic measure in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: 2006L01305.