Comparison of Minimal Incision Exposure versus Traditional Anterior Approach for Thoracolumbar fracture surgery:A Retrospective Study

Huang Haifeng,Liu Hao,Zhao Xiaodan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2009.01.005
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of minimal incision exposure and traditional anterior approach for thor-acolumbar fracture surgery,to find out the characters of minimal incision approach and to improve the operative method.Method 19 cases with thoracolumbar fracture treated with minimal incision approach,using SynFrame*(AO Inc.CH)or EndoRingTM anterior spinal retractor system(Medtronic Inc.USA),and 25 cases treated with traditional approach from January 2005 to January 2008 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.The effects of the two approaches were com-pared.Statistical analysis was conducted with 2 and Student t tests.Results All the operations were successful.The average amount of blood loss in the minimal incision approach group was 398.42±52.52ml,significantly less than that(739.60±153.88ml)in traditional approach group(P<0.001);The mean incision length in the mini-open approach group was 11.05±1.31cm,again significantly less than that(19.40±1.55cm)in traditional approach group(P<0.001);The rate of the restorement of bowel function in the minimal incision approach group was 15/19(78.9%),significantly higher than that(2/25(8%))in traditional approach group(P<0.001);the visual analogue scale(VAS)in the minimal incision approach gro-up was 3.57±0.76,significantly lower than that(2.64±0.99)in the other group(P<0.001).No significant difference was found in the rest of the evaluation indexes between two groups(P>0.05).All patients were followed up for 6 ~ 24 months(the average is 14.50±2.40 months).No patient complained pain ever again after surgery.Successful bony fusion was ac-complished in all patients.Conclusion Thoracolumbar fracture surgery via anterior approach can be performed with the help of SynFrame or EndoRingTM system.Compared with traditional approach,it is less invasive,with better expo-sure,less bleeding,less complication rate,as well as similar effect,and is yet easier to master,Therefore,it is of value for application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?