Islet Alone Versus Islet after Kidney Transplantation: Metabolic Outcomes and Islet Graft Survival

Shaoping Deng,James F. Markmann,Micheal Rickels,Heidi Yeh,James I. Kim,Moh-Moh Lian,Yi Gu,Eileen Markmann,Maral Palanjian,Clyde F. Barker,Ali Naji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e3181b4bdbb
2009-01-01
Transplantation
Abstract:Background. Isolated islet transplantation with infusions from two to three donor pancreata and Edmonton immunosuppression consistently achieves insulin independence in patients with type 1 diabetes. The success of this protocol has been attributed to a novel combination of immunosuppressive agents and avoidance of steroids; however, the outcome of islet transplantation may differ in kidney transplant recipients who are already immunosuppressed. Methods. We compared the metabolic outcomes and graft survival of islet transplantation in our program where nine patients underwent islet transplantation alone treated with Edmonton immunosuppression and eight patients received islet after kidney (IAK) transplants under standard kidney transplant immunosuppression often including steroids. Results. Transplants in the IAK and islet transplantation alone setting demonstrated similar islet potency (islet equivalents/unit insulin reduction) and recipients from both groups routinely gained insulin independence, functional islet mass, and duration of graft survival, however, seemed superior in the IAK group. Conclusions. These results suggest that better islet graft function and survival may be attained using non-Edmonton rather than Edmonton immunosuppression and can include maintenance steroid therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?