Abstract:BackgroundDNA isolation and PCR amplification from molluscan taxa is considered as problematic because polysaccharides in tissue and mucus presumably co-precipitate with the DNA and inhibit the activity of DNA polymerase. In the present study we tested two common extraction methods on specimens from the mollusc collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (NHMW). We analysed a broad variety of taxa covering a large temporal span (acquisition years 1877 to 1999), which distinguishes our study from previous ones where mostly fresh material was used. We also took other factors into account: effects of sample age, effects of formaldehyde treatment and taxon-specific problems. We used several primer combinations to amplify amplicons of different lengths of two mitochondrial genes: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 16S rRNA gene (16S).ResultsOverall PCR success was 43 % in the 576 extractions (including all primer combinations). The smallest amplicon (~240 bp) showed the best results (49 % positive reactions), followed by the 400 bp amplicon (40.5 %). Both short sections yielded significantly better results than the 700 bp long amplicon (27 %). Comparatively, the Gen-ial-First, All-tissue DNA-Kit—extraction method performed significantly better than Promega-Tissue and Hair Extraction Kit. Generally, PCR success is age-dependent. Nonetheless, we were able to obtain the longest amplicon even from 137-year-old material. Importantly, formaldehyde traces did not totally inhibit amplification success, although very high concentrations did.ConclusionsMuseum material has gained importance for DNA analysis in recent years, especially for DNA barcoding projects. In some cases, however, the amplification of the standard barcoding region (partial sequence of the COI) is problematic with old material. Our study clearly shows that the COI barcoding region could be amplified in up to 49 % of PCRs (varying with amplicon length), which is, for museum samples, quite a high percentage. The difference between extraction methods was minimal and we recommend using an established kit for a first attempt because experience and routine in handling might be more important than slight performance differences of the various kits. Finally, we identify fixation, storage, sample conservation and documentation of the specimens’ history rather than the DNA extraction method to be the most crucial factors for PCR success.

Extraction of DNA from Single Mite by Promoted Chelex-100 Method

Comparison and Improvement of DNA Micro-Extraction Methods Using Single Cell of Ciliates

A Rapid Method for Extracting DNA from Actinomycetes by Chelex-100

Extraction and Random Primer PCR Detection of Genomic DNA of Parasitic Mites Demodex Folliculorum and Demodex Brevis(acari:Demodicidae)

Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction for Aquatic Animal DNA Virus Determination Using Chelex 100 Resin via Conventional PCR and Digital Droplet PCR Detection

Improvement on the extraction method of RNA in mites and its quality test

A Simple,Rapid and Universal Method of Mortierella Ramanni Ana DNA Extraction with CTAB and SDS

Direct Dna Extraction Method of an Obligate Parasitic Fungus from Infected Plant Tissue

Comparison of Five Different Methods of Extracting Genomic DNA from Oncomelania Hupensis

Rapid Diagnosis of Two Common Stored-Product Predatory Mite Species Based on Species-Specific Pcr

A Renewed DNA Extraction Method for Molecular Study of Melampsora Larici-Populina

The polymerase chain reaction and sequencing of mite DNA

Constructing and Detecting A Cdna Library for Mites

The improvement for method of DNA extraction from animal tissue and PCR detection

A Simple Method of High Quality Genomic DNA Extraction from Molluscs

[Comparison of Mtdna Extracting Methods for Common Sarcosaphagous Insects].

An efficient extraction method of pathogenic fungus DNA for PCR

A Method of Quickly Extracting DNA from Genome of Intestinal Microorganism

DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods

A method for extracting the geneome DNA of Sitodiplosis mosellana.

A New Rapid Method for Extraction of High Quality of Genomic DNA from Animal Tissues