Abstract:Importance: Accumulating evidence indicates that higher blood pressure (BP) variability from one physician office visit to the next (hereafter referred to as visit-to-visit BP variability) is associated with poor outcomes. Short-term measurement (throughout 1 year) of visit-to-visit BP variability in high-risk older patients may help identify patients at increased risk of death.Objective: To evaluate whether short-term visit-to-visit BP variability is associated with increased long-term mortality risk.Design, Setting, and Participants: The US cohort of the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study (INVEST), a randomized clinical trial of 16 688 patients aged 50 years or older with hypertension and coronary artery disease, was conducted between September 2, 1997, and December 15, 2000, with in-trial follow-up through February 14, 2003. The study evaluated a calcium antagonist (sustained-release verapamil plus trandolapril) vs β-blocker (atenolol plus hydrochlorothiazide) treatment strategy. Blood pressure measurement visits were scheduled every 6 weeks for the first 6 months and biannually thereafter. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2, 1997, to May 1, 2014.Exposures: Visit-to-visit systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP variability during the first year of enrollment using 4 different BP variability measures: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, average real variability, and variability independent of the mean.Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause death, assessed via the US National Death Index, beginning after the exposure assessment period through May 1, 2014.Results: For the present post hoc analysis, long-term mortality data were available on 16 688 patients (9001 women [54%]; mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.9] years; 45% White patients, 16% Black patients, and 37% Hispanic patients). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.9 (4.2) years, 5058 patients (30%) died. All 4 variability measures for SBP were significantly associated with long-term mortality after adjustment for baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities. After comparison of lowest vs highest variability measure quintiles, the magnitude of the association with death remained statistically significant even after adjustment for baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities (average real variability: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30; standard deviation: aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; coefficient of variation: aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; variability independent of the mean: aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25). The signal was stronger in women compared with men. Associations of diastolic BP variability measures with death were weaker than for SBP and were not significant after adjustment.Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, in a large population of older patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease, short-term visit-to-visit SBP variability was associated with excess long-term mortality, especially for women. Efforts to identify and minimize visit-to-visit SBP variability may be important in reducing excess mortality later in life.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133692.

Variability of Blood Pressure in 3 Consecutive Measurements and the Influence Factors

Correlation Between Visit-to-visit and Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability Calculated Using Different Methods and Glomerular Filtration Rate

The discrepancy among 3 blood pressure readings

ASSA13-14-27 the Impact of Blood Pressure Levels, Gender and Age on Within-Visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Discrepancy among Three Blood Pressure Readings Within One Measurement and Relevant Influencing Factors

Within-visit Blood Pressure Variability in an Unselected Adult Population

Variability in Blood Pressure Measurements from Recorded Auscultation Sounds.

Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

The correlation study on the visit to visit blood pressure variability of systolic blood pressure and brachial ankle pulse wave velocity in middle aged population

Preventing Troublesome Variability in Clinical Blood Pressure Measurement

How important is blood pressure variability?

Comparison of the Mean of the First Two Blood Pressure Readings with the Overall Mean of Three Readings on a Single Occasion.

BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AND HISTORY OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN MAY MEASUREMENT MONTH 2019 PARTICIPANTS

Association of 1-Year Blood Pressure Variability With Long-term Mortality Among Adults With Coronary Artery Disease

Factors influencing blood pressure variability in postmenopausal women: evidence from the China Health and Nutrition Survey

Age Dependency of Peripheral and Central Systolic Blood Pressures: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Observations in a Chinese Population

The Prevalence And Influence Factors Of Inter-Ankle Systolic Blood Pressure Difference In Community Population

Within-visit BP variability in Children & Adolescents in the NHANES (2013-2020)

Ps-p04-4: blood pressure variability in preschool children

Risk factors correlated with blood pressure variability in elderly patients with essential hypertension

Associations between Five-Year Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality