Measurement of Both Nonvolatile and Semi-Volatile Fractions of Fine Particulate Matter in Fresno, CA

Brett D. Grover,Norman L. Eatough,Delbert J. Eatough,Judith C. Chow,John G. Watson,Jeffrey L. Ambs,Michael B. Meyer,Philip K. Hopke,Rida Al-Horr,Douglas W. Later,William E. Wilson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600615071
2006-01-01
Aerosol Science and Technology
Abstract:An intensive sampling campaign was performed in Fresno, CA during December 2003 measuring fine particulate matter including both the semi-volatile and nonvolatile fractions of the aerosol. Both the newly developed R&P FDMS Monitor and a PC-BOSS have been shown to measure total PM2.5 concentrations including semi-volatile nitrate and organic material. Good agreement was observed between the PC-BOSS and the R&P FDMS Monitor in this study with linear regression analysis resulting in a zero-intercept slope of 1.00 +/- 0.02 and an R-2 = 0.93. Several real-time measuring systems including the R&P Differential TEOM, the Met One BAMS, and a GRIMM Monitor were also employed and comparisons of total PM2.5 mass were made with the R&P FDMS Monitor. Agreement among these various monitors was generally good. However, differences were sometimes seen. Reasons for observed differences in the real-time mass measurement systems are explained by the composition and complexity of the measured aerosol, most importantly the composition of semi-volatile material. A newly automated ion chromatographic system developed by Dionex was also field tested and compared to both R&P 8400N Nitrate and integrated PC-BOSS inorganic species measurements. Sulfate and nitrate determined by the Dionex and PC-BOSS systems agreed. However, nitrate measured by the 8400N was low during fog events compared to the other two systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?