Substructures and Density Profiles of Clusters in Models of Galaxy Formation

YP JING,HJ MO,G BORNER,LZ FANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/276.2.417
IF: 4.8
1995-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:In this paper we investigate, using high-resolution N-body simulations, the density profiles and the morphologies of galaxy clusters in seven models of structure formation. We show that these properties of clusters are closely related to the occurrence of a significant merging event in the recent past. The seven models are: (1) the standard cold dark matter model (SCDM) with Omega(0) = 1, Lambda(0) = 0 and h = 0.5; (2) a low-density flat model (FL03) with Omega(0) = 0.3, Lambda(0) = 0.7 and h = 0.75; (3) an open model (OP03) with Omega(0) = 0.3, Lambda(0) = 0 and h = 0.75; (4) a low-density flat model (FL02) with Omega(0) = 0.2, Lambda(0) = 0.8 and h = 1; (5) an open model (OP02) with Omega(0) = 0.2, Lambda(0) = 0 and h = 1; (6) a low-density flat model (FL01) with Omega(0) = 0.1 and Lambda(0) = 0.9; and (7) an open model (OP01) with Omega(0) = 0.1 and Lambda(0) = 0. We find that the density profiles and morphologies of clusters depend both on Omega(0) and on Lambda(0). For Lambda(0) = 0, these properties are a monotonic function of Omega(0). Clusters in OP01 have the steepest density profiles, their density contours are the roundest and show the smallest centre shifts among the density contours. The other extreme case is SCDM, where clusters show the least steep density profiles and the most elongated contours. For a given Omega(0) (<1), clusters in the flat model (i.e. with Lambda(0) = 1-Omega(0)) have flatter density profiles and more substructures than in the corresponding open model. Clusters in FL03 have density profiles and centre shifts close to those in SCDM, although their density contours are rounder. Our results show that, although cluster density profiles and morphologies are useful cosmological tests, low-density flat models with Omega(0) similar to 0.3, which are currently considered as a successful alternative to SCDM, can produce a substantial fraction of clusters with substructures. This is in contrast to conclusions drawn from previous work.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?