Abstract:Abstract In a recent issue of this Journal, Cogliano (in ‘Marx’s equalized rate of exploitation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2023, vol. 47, no. 1, 133–69) provided a theoretical basis of the hypothesis that the rates of exploitation are uniform across industries. In this paper, we compare the hypothesis and an alternative approach that assumes that the value creation per unit concrete labour is uniform. As neither approach considers skill differentials, we provide an extended framework that incorporates skills explicitly for the comparison. In addition, our framework considers the value creation of workers as a function of their skills and efforts of labour and, following Yoshihara (in ‘Wealth, exploitation and labor discipline in the contemporary capitalist economy’, Metroeconomica, 1998, vol. 49, no.1, 23–61), we define the ratio between effort and wage as labour discipline. Within this framework, we show the following. The equalisation of the rates of exploitation is eventually assuming that the ratios between the value creation and wage are equalised and it implies that high-skilled workers experience proportionately weaker labour discipline whereas low-skilled workers experience stronger labour discipline. On the other hand, the alternative approach that assumes the equalisation of the value creation per unit concrete labour implies that high-skilled workers work proportionately less intensively whereas low-skilled workers work proportionately more intensively.

The Duahity of Productive Labor and Bourgeois Right

A Logical Evolution of Marx's Conception on Burgher Society

Analysis of a Conception in Critique on Guiding Principle of Gotha

“Productive Forces” and “Relations of Production” in Marx

On Marx' S Dialectic of Labor

Productivity Examined under Historical Materialism

From Principle to Context: Marx versus Nozick and Rawls on Distributive Justice

Working Out Marx: Marxism and the End of the Work Society

Interpreting Route of "Consumer Society":Karl Marx's Angle and Its Significance——Comments on the Methodological Shortcoming of Western Marxists' Viewpoints of Consumer Society

The Development of the Productive Force and the Prisoner’s Dilemma of Capital

Material Production and Social Reproduction

A note on the two approaches to the distribution of surplus value

On Labor in the View of Philosophical Economics:Inheritance and Transcendence of Marx to Hegel’s Concept of Labor

Productivity is What and What is Productivity:Analysis on Marx's Theory of Productivity from the Perspective of Systems Theory

Is “Non-productive Labor” a Subversive Element of Marxism?:On Jean Baudrillard's Misunderstanding of Marxism

The Theory of Distribution According to Contribution to Production Factors:Contention and Development

On Capital Productivity——With Consideration to a Kind of Viewpoint

How to Generate the Surplus Value Is a Puzzle Difficult to Solve?——Jean Baudrillard's Wrong Understanding of Marx' s Labor Force as Goods

Marx's Achievements in His Criticism of Proudhon——an Analysis on the Significance of The Poverty of Theory

The Change of the View of Private Property: The Theoretical Opportunity of Marx's Transcendence of Philosophical Communism

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning