Diverse Structural Assemblies and Variable Conductivities of Silver-Hexamethylenetetramine Coordination Polymers with 2-, 3-, and 4-Sulfobenzoate Ligands

Xiao-Feng Zheng,Long-Guan Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c000028k
IF: 3.756
2010-01-01
CrystEngComm
Abstract:Self-assembly reactions of sulfobenzoates and Ag(I)-hmt system resulted in the formation of one previously reported complex, {[Ag-4(hmt)(2)(2-sb)(2)(H2O)]center dot 2H(2)O}(n) (1), and two new silver-sulfobenzoate complexes {[Ag-4(hmt)(2)(3-sb)(2)(H2O)(2)]center dot 2H(2)O}(n) (2), and {[Ag-3(hmt)(2)(4-sb)(NO3)(H2O)]center dot 3H(2)O}(n) (3) (sb sulfobenzoate and hmt hexamethylenetetramine). These coordination polymers were characterized by single-crystal X-ray analyses, elemental analyses, IR spectra, TG analyses, fluorescence studies, and electric conductivity. Complexes 2 and 3 are 3D coordination networks having novel topologies with different channels, where the Ag-Ag bonds play vital roles. In these complexes, hmt ligands act as mu(3)- and mu(4)- bridges in 1 and 3, and just mu(4)- in 2. The configurations of the Ag-hmt units in 1-3 are different: chair types in 1 and 2, and boat type in 3. The disparately relative positions of carboxylate and sulfonate groups on benzyl rings of 2, 3, and 4-sulfobenzoate ligands and the different coordination modes of sulfobenzoates lead to the different dimensionalities and networks. The different packing environments of Ag-Ag bonds in 1-3 (no Ag-Ag interaction in 1 and the strongest Ag-Ag interactions in 2) result in the distinct fluorescence properties and electric conductivity. There is no any study of electric conductivity for Ag-hmt complexes in the references so far, and the complex 2 has the best electric conductivity in all our reported Ag-sulfobenzoate complexes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?