Phylogeny and functional divergence of ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acid desaturase families]

Ling-Liang Guan,Kai Hou,Jun-Wen Chen,Ying-Wen Xu,Wei Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1005.2013.00643
2013-01-01
Abstract:The deduced amino acid sequences characteristics, phylogeny, and functional diverge of ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acid desaturase families were analyzed by using Bioinformatics methods. The results showed that all the deduced amino acid sequences shared three highly conserved histidine rich motifs (Hisbox). All the plastidial ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acid desaturases possessed putative N-terminal signal peptide with different amino acids. A relatively conserved hydrophobic region composed of 10 amino-acid residues was found in the middle of signal peptides, which is presumed to be the functional region of the signal peptide of these enzymes. Most of the plant microsomal ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acid desaturases (FAD2 and FAD3) contained a KKXX-like motif of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal at the C-terminus. However, no such motif was detected in safflower CtFAD2-3, CtFAD2-4, CtFAD2-5, CtFAD2-6, and CtFAD2-7, while an aromatic aa enriched signal (YKNK) was found at their C-terminus which has been reported to be both necessary and sufficient for maintaining localization of the enzymes in the ER. All the amino acid sequences were divided into four categories through phylogenetic analysis. It was suggested that ω-3 fatty acid desaturase originates in a prokaryotic lineage from ω-6 fatty acid desaturase. Both plastidial and microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturases could be divided into dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous subgroups, which inferred that functional differentiation of plastidial and microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturases had been formed before the divergence of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Seed type and housekeeping type FAD2 diverged after the formation of dicotyledonous plants. Except for plant FAD3/plant FAD2, posterior probability values over 0.80 amino acid sites were identified among the functional differentiation subsets, which were mainly distributed at the front and back end of Hisbox I, and the front end of Hisbox II. This indicated that the variations of these amino acid sites played an important role in the size and conformation of protein functional domains and subfamily functional divergence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?