Abstract:Objective:To explore the difference of blood pressure control rate recommended in Chinese type 2 diabetes guidelines ver. 2013 and ver. 2017 based on home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and automated office blood pressure (AOBP) in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension.Methods:Subjects were enrolled according to the following criteria: (1) type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension who were regularly followed in the Internet Plus Diabetes Shared Cared Clinic of Peking University First Hospital and whose AOBP was measured twice with an arm sphygmomanometer, with the mean value recorded; and (2) using an intelligent arm sphygmomanometer, the patients automatically uploaded their HBPM through APP ≥3 times/quarter, each time they monitored blood pressure in the resting state on the morning or before dinner on separate days. The AOBP and the mean value of HBPM before visit were compared. The difference of the control rate of AOBP and HBPM based on the recommendations of the two versions of guidelines [＜130/80 mmHg, ＜140/80 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)] was analyzed. Chi-square test was used to determine the difference between the blood pressure control rate of AOBP and HBPM; paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between the two sources of blood pressure in the same patient.Results:Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, and they had 9.5 (5.0, 25.0) times of HBPM in the first quarter before the last visit. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of AOBP were (140.9±17.2) mmHg and (82.8±9.3) mmHg, respectively. The SBP and DBP of HBPM were (128.5±11.1) mmHg and (76.0±9.3) mmHg, respectively (P＜0.001). Based on the results of AOBP, the blood pressure control rates of ＜140/80 mmHg and ＜130/80 mmHg were 32.5% and 5.0% respectively, while the blood pressure control rates of ＜140/80 mmHg and ＜130/80 mmHg were 60.0% and 52.5% respectively based on the results of HBPM. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=17.425, P=0.002). The SBP and DBP of AOBP were overestimated by (15.7±18.9) mmHg and (9.6±9.3) mmHg, respectively (P＜0.001), compared with the mean value of HBPM in patients whose blood pressure of AOBP was ≥140/80 mmHg. The SBP and DBP of AOBP were overestimated by (18.2±14.1) mmHg and (10.4±9.4) mmHg respectively (P＜0.001), compared with the mean value of HBPM in patients whose blood pressure of HBPM was＜130/80 mmHg.Conclusion:Compared with the HBPM, AOBP significantly overestimates the blood pressure of type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension by about 12.3/6.8 mmHg. When the AOBP is taken as the judgment of blood pressure not reaching the target, the blood pressure may be more overestimated.

Evaluation on the White Coat Effect in Consulting Room Through Automatic Office Blood Pressure Monitoring

The Effect of Physician Presence on Blood Pressure

The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension

Analysis of the office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring among clinical nurses from level of first-class hospitals

White Coat Effect in Hypertensive Patients: the Role of Hospital Environment or Physician Presence

ACCURACY AND BLOOD PRESSURE THRESHOLD CONTROL ANALYSIS OF UNATTENDED AUTOMATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY BASED ON MULTICENTER POPULATIONS

Effects of room environment and nursing experience on clinical blood pressure measurement: an observational study.

A0241 Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis of White Coat and Masked Hypertension

A0775 Sex difference in home-office blood pressure difference: an observational study based on home blood pressure monitoring

Relationship Between White-Coat Effect and Blood Pressure Variability in Essential Hypertension

Evaluation of the applicability of deep breathing test in the diagnosis of hypertension with white-coat effect in Chinese patients in primary care

OfficeBP

White-coat Hypertension on Automated Blood Pressure Measurement: Implications for Clinical Practice

Comparison of blood pressure control standards based on home blood pressure monitoring and automated office blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Shared Care Clinic

Intelligent Assist Office Blood Pressures (IOBP) versus awake ambulatory monitoring and conventional auscultatory office readings in Chinese primary medical institutions

The Effects Between Single Long-Acting and Combination of Short-Acting Antihypertensive Drugs Treatment on Visit-to-visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

The Effect of Different Observed Period on Blood Pressure - Temperature Relationship Evaluation

Preventing Troublesome Variability in Clinical Blood Pressure Measurement

Associations between various attended automated office blood pressure estimations and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: Minhang study

A14101 Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurements —conventional Office, Automated Office, and Self-Measured Home

Unattended automatic blood pressure measurements versus conventional office readings in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage