Knowledge and study of modality between visual and auditory inhibition of return

Hu Ke-song,Bao Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.10.049
2006-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Inhibition of return refers to the delayed responses to targets at previously attended locations or objects as compared to novel ones. This paper summarized the characteristics, research results as well as the problems in the studies in inhibition of return area and suggested out some possible directions for future research. DATA SOURCES: A computer-based online search of Medline database was undertaken to identify the relevant articles about inhibition of return published in English from January 1985 to January 2005 by using theof "inhibition of return", some resources were from Peking University Library. STUDY SELECTION: The articles about visual, auditory and cross modality inhibition of return were selected. Inclusive criteria: inhibition of return. Exclusive criteria: tactile inhibition of return and other articles irrelative to this paper. DATA EXTRACTION: Totally 50 articles were collected, and 18 in accordance with the inclusion criteria were reviewed, other articles about tactile inhibition of return and those irrelative to this paper were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Early studies on inhibition of return originated from visual field. After the phenomenon is found in visual modality, people find it also happens in auditory and tactile modalities, and cross-modal one. ① Effect of different modality on the inhibition of return: The inhibition of return effect of visual modality is greater than that of auditory one, and this pattern is irrelevant to the response mode. The intensities of visual/auditory target affect the dimension of inhibition of return, the inhibition of return effect is greater when the target intensity is weaker, and the cue-effect between modalities is weaker than that inside modality. Visual and auditory cues play a role of cue to visual target. In the task of location, visual modality has the specialty of modality, but auditory has the ultra-modality. The task of differentiation acts the cross-modal cue role under the condition of auditory cue-visual target. ③ Renew location of eye movement, scanning and center: Before the appearance of target, whether attention can return to the central attention point has great influence on the occurrence of auditory inhibition of return. ④ Neurological study between the visual and auditory modalities: Epithalamus responses to visual, auditory and tactile events, and codes to the modalities by means of independent or united spatial map, and is involved in the sound scanning and process, and the process of other cross-modal attention. CONCLUSION: It is commonly believed now that inhibition of return is a common cross-modal phenomenon, which can ensure the exploration of attention object with high efficacy. The deeper study on the cross-modal inhibition of return will finally be benefit for the better understanding of the essence of modal inhibition of return.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?