Abstract:Background: The ideal depth of general anesthesia should achieve the required levels of hypnosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation while minimizing physiologic responses to awareness. The choice of anesthetic strategy in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing major noncardiac surgery is becoming an increasingly important issue as the population ages. This is because general anesthesia is associated with a risk of perioperative cardiac complications and death, and this risk is much higher in people with CHD. Aim: To compare hemodynamic function and cardiovascular event rate between etomidate- and propofol-based anesthesia in patients with CHD. Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II/III) with stable CHD (New York Heart Association class I/II) undergoing major noncardiac surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either etomidate/remifentanil-based or propofol/remifentanil-based general anesthesia. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random number table and sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Concealment was maintained until the patient had arrived in the operating theater, at which point the consulting anesthetist opened the envelope. All patients, data collectors, and data analyzers were blinded to the type of anesthesia used. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of cardiovascular events (bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats) during anesthesia and cardiac troponin I level at 24 h. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, bispectral index, and use of vasopressors during anesthesia. Results: The final analysis included 40 patients in each of the propofol and etomidate groups. The incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats during anesthesia were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the etomidate group (P < 0.05 for all). The incidence of tachycardia was similar between the two groups. Cardiac troponin I levels were comparable between the two groups both before the induction of anesthesia and at 24 h after surgery. When compared with the etomidate group, the propofol group had significantly lower heart rates at 3 min after the anesthetic was injected (T1) and immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), lower systolic blood pressure at T1, and lower diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at T1, T2, 3 min after tracheal intubation, and 5 min after tracheal intubation (P < 0.05 for all). Vasopressor use was significantly more in the propofol group than in the etomidate group during the induction and maintenance periods (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with CHD undergoing noncardiac major surgery, etomidate-based anesthesia is associated with fewer cardiovascular events and smaller hemodynamic changes than propofol-based anesthesia.

Effects of Etomidate and Propofol on First-MECT Seizure Duration.

Comparative Study Between Etomidate and Propofol for Induction of Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy in Schizophrenic Patients

Etomidate versus Propofol for Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorders in Terms of Clinical Responses to Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis

Propofol EC50 for Inducing Loss of Consciousness in Patients under Combined Epidural-General Anesthesia or General Anesthesia Alone: a Randomized Double-Blind Study

Beyond the surface: analyzing etomidate and propofol as anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis of seizure duration outcomes

Effectiveness of propofol in anesthetic management and cognitive function in schizophrenic patients undergoing convulsion-free modified electroconvulsive therapy

Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate Versus Propofol on Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery

Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: An intraindividual comparative study during the COVID-19 pandemic

Most Americans Do Not Believe That There Is An Association Between Health Care Prices And Quality Of Care.

Sevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy: Comparison of seizure duration and haemodynamic responses

The Effect of Remimazolam on Seizure Profile, Hemodynamics, and Recovery in Patients With Electroconvulsive Therapy Comparison With Propofol and Etomidate: A Retrospective Study

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Electrocorticography Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Epilepsy Surgery

Effects of target controlled infusion of propofol on electrocorticography during epileptic foci resection

Ketamine plus propofol-electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) transiently improves the antidepressant effects and the associated brain functional alterations in patients with propofol-ECT-resistant depression

The Effect of Remimazolam on Seizure Profile, Hemodynamics, and Recovery in Patients With Electroconvulsive Therapy Comparison With Propofol and Etomidate

Mechanisms of Propofol Attenuation of Ketamine-Induced Neonatal Brain Injury

Pretreatment With Oxycodone Simultaneously Reduces Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus And Rocuronium-Induced Withdrawal Movements During Rapidsequence Induction

Effects of Propfol and Ketamine on Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potential in the Ventral Partition of Medial Geniculate Body of Rat

Effects of Propofol on Cortical Electroencephalograms in the Operation of Glioma-Related Epilepsy

Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

A comparison between target-controlled and manually controlled propofol infusions in patients undergoing routine surgical procedures.