An Investigation into the Semantics of the Definite-topic Construction

李文山
2013-01-01
Abstract:Previous studies have revealed that a semantically well-formed object-fronted-as-topic sentence ( OFAT) has to meet an important semantic condition: The part of comment expresses (or implicates) the state of the topic. This is the macro-condition that an OFAT must satisfy. A sentence of this type has to satisfy a number of micro-conditions. When the topic is a definite NP,verbs of creation taking the aspect marker le or guo can appear in the comment. When the topic is a proximal definite NP,verbs of destruction can not appear in the comment if taking le but can if taking guo. When the topic is a distal definite NP,verbs of creation can appear in the comment no matter whether taking le or guo. Verbs that express neither creation nor destruction behave in various ways. Whether a verb of this type can appear in the ORAT depends on whether the combination of its ontological meaning and the meaning of an aspect marker can trigger an inference about the state of the topic in a particular context.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?