Experimental Study on Mercury Removal by Combined Wet Flue Gas Desulphurization with Electrostatic Precipitator

王运军,段钰锋,杨立国,孟素丽,黄治军,吴成军,王乾
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2008.29.012
2008-01-01
Abstract:Applying the Ontario hydro method (OHM) and the US Enviroment Protection Agency (EPA) standard methods, the flue gas mercury sampling before and after electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and wet flue gas desulphurization (WFGD) located at coal-fired power plants was carried out on site and various mercury speciations, such as Hg0, Hg2+ and HgP in flue gas, were analyzed. The solid samples, such as coal, bottom ash and ESP ash desulphurization product, were analyzed by direct mercury analyzer DMA 80. According to mercury balance, mercury speciation and its distribution in different locations downstream the flue gas were obtained. Results show that the flue gas mercury exists mainly as Hg0. The share of Hg0 is over than 80% and Hg2+ less than 20%. HgP can be removed by ESP efficiently, and partial Hg0 is oxidized to Hg2+. The total mercury removal and Hg2+ adsorption efficiency by WFGD are both zero, but more than 50% Hg2+ is reduced to Hg0. The enrichment factors are less than 1 in both bottom ash and fly ash, but it is over than 1 in desulphurization products. Mercury is exhausted in bottom ash and fly ash but enriched in desulphurization products.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?