A comparison of spinal surgery under general anesthesia with or without muscle relaxants

XU Cheng-ming,LI Yu-lan,LIU Ying-long,LV Xing-hua,WAN Zhan-hai
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of general anesthesia with or without muscle relaxant in spinal surgery.Methods Seventy ASA Ⅰ orⅡ adults undergoing elective spinal surgery were randomly divided into two groups:study group(group T) and control group(group C).General anesthesia was induced with midazolam,fentanyl,propofol and succinylcholine,and maintained with propofol and remifentanil.The BIS was controlled in the range of 30-60.After induction,atracrium was used in group C but not in group T.BIS and TOFr at baseline,after induction,during incision,30mins and 60mins after incision and during extubation were recorded.The dosage of propofol and remifentanil,the time to eyes-opening,extubation time,OAA /S scale 20 mins after extubation and possible adverse effects were compared.The muscle tone of each patient was scaled by surgeons at the end of surgery.Results There was no significant difference in the dosage of remifentanil,muscle tone scale,body movements or needs of vasoactive medication between the two groups.The dosage of propofol in group T was higher than that in group C(P<0.05),and TOFr in group T were significantly higher than that in group C after intubation(P<0.01).The time to eyes-open,extubation time was shorter and the BIS was higher during extubation in group T as compared with group C(P<0.05 or P<0.01),and OAA /S scale 20 mins after extubation was significantly lower in group T than in group C(P<0.01).Conclusion General anesthesia without muscle relaxant can not only provide satisfactory surgical conditions but also provoke earlier emergence in spinal surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?