Abstract:Many principles controlling the modern western civil law, such as consideration, prescription and capacity, have taken shape in history. This paper, from a historical perspective, explores the logic and rationale behind Chinese common law by focusing on the formation of contract in the Qing Dynasty. The first section shows that in the Qing Dynasty, the delivering of the subject matter was a basic requirement to form a loan contract between two parties. However, an agreement for transferring the item in advance worked as a consensual and bilateral contract, and the aggrieved party could ask for compensation or contractual fine or retain the deposit when the other party broke the contract. The second section argues that in the Qing Dynasty, the writing of a loan contract (Shuqi) is not a contract in and of itself, but is only one of the forms of contracts. The writing worked as the primary evidence of the existence of a contract. In the third section, the requirements of consideration and prescription are used to understand the practice of civil trials in the Qing Dynasty. Back then, when the loan contracts provided by two parties entailed some defects, the judges would adjudicate a loan dispute on the basis of consideration, with an assumption that people acted in their own interest and only in this sense were their acts rational. The judges could also identify the right(s) of parties due to the lapse of time. The fourth section argues against the view that equality was not used as a principle to form civil contracts in Chinese history. In Ancient China, there was indeed inequality between officials and laymen and within family or clan. However, in the Qing Dynasty, the different social status of the parties had little to do with the formation of contract. The restrictions for junior individuals (e.g. beiyou) to dispose his family property were actually restrictions on their capability instead of limitations on his capacity to enjoy private right or to have private obligation.

Civil Litigation Customs in Ancient China

On the Characteristics of Chinese Legal Culture by Studying the Ancient Liege Relationship

Civil Laws in China and Judicial Cases

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

DISCOVERING THE CHINESE COMMON LAW: THE FORMATION OF THE LOAN CONTRACT IN THE QING DYNASTY

Analysis on the Spirit of Ancient Chinese Judicial Rules

Initiative Or Passivism:A Discussion on the Regulation of Civil and Commercial Customs By Da-Li-Yuan

Ancient China’s Legal Tradition and Legal Thought

Chinese Legal Culture: From Tradition to Modernity

On the Basic Principles in Civil Laws and Their Relations

Functions Of Chinese Modal Verbs In The Civil Legislation Of The People'S Republic Of China: A Sociosemiotic Perspective

THE REFORM OF CIVIL ONLINE LITIGATION IN CHINA: DEVELOPMENT AND PREDICAMENTS

International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System

The “Legal-civil Relations” in the Rule-of-law Practice of Contemporary China

Imported Rules and Traditional Customs in the Process of Legal Modernization:The Case of Sacrificial Fields

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

The Position of Judges in Civil Litigation in Transitional China-Judicial Mediation and Case Management

Reformation, Inheritance and the Evolvement of Law: A Cultural Analysis of Confucianization of the Ancient Chinese Laws

Form at the Expense of True Significance: From the “Tang Lü Complex” to “Civil Code Complex”

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Legislation and Judicial Practice of China'S Group Action