Abstract:Introduction: The optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC + LCBDE + T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP + subsequent LC (ERCP + LC group, n = 275), LC + LCBDE + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) + primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, n = 479) and LC + laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, n = 280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results: There was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP + LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP + LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16 ± 3.88 days vs 6.92 ± 1.71 days vs 10.74 ± 5.30 days, P < 0.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08 ± 42.79 min vs 92.31 ± 10.26 min, 99.09 ± 8.46 min, P < 0.05). Compared to ERCP + LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP + LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72 months. Four patients in ERCP + LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones. Conclusion: All the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP + LC. LC + LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC + LCBDE + T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.

Outcones of different operation procedures for hepatolithiasis

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: a Feasibility and Safety Study in 29 Patients

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Role of anatomic hepatectomy performed under vascular exclusion in management of hepatolithiasis]

[Treatment of Hepatolithiasis by Multiple Operative Methods with Hepatico-Subcutaneous Stoma].

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis in China

Effectiveness of hepatic parenchyma lithotomy of hepatolithiasis: A single-center experience

Endoscopic or laparoscopic approach for hepatolithiasis in the era of endoscopy in China

Surgical Strategies for Hepaotolithiasis

Surgical management of hepatolithiasis

The Evaluation of Intraoperative Choledochoscopy and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Refractory Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones

Management Hepatolithiasis with Operative Choledochoscopic FREDDY Laser Lithotripsy Combined with or Without Hepatectomy

Comparison of triple-scope combined bile duct exploration lithotripsy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis (with video)

Laparoscopic approach of surgical treatment for primary hepatolithiasis: a cohort study

Long‐term Outcomes of Surgical Approaches for Bilateral Hepatolithiasis: A Real‐world Six‐decade Experience at a Single Center

Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution

A Study of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis

Clinical effects of subcutaneous tunnel hepatocholangioplasty on the treatment of hepatolithiasis]