Elastic Constants of Osmium Between 5 and 300 K

C. Pantea,I. Stroe,H. Ledbetter,J. B. Betts,Y. Zhao,L. L. Daemen,H. Cynn,A. Migliori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.80.024112
IF: 3.7
2009-01-01
Physical Review B
Abstract:Using two measurement methods, pulse-echo ultrasound and resonance ultrasound spectroscopy, we measured the elastic constants of both monocrystal and polycrystal osmium between 5 and 300 K. Our measurements help to resolve the current measurement-and-theory controversy concerning whether osmium's bulk modulus exceeds diamond's. It does not at any temperature (for osmium, we find a zero-temperature bulk modulus of 410 GPa and a 300 K value of 405 GPa, while diamond's value being 442 GPa). From the zero-temperature elastic constants, we extract a Debye temperature of 477 K. From Gruumlneisen's first rule, we extract a Gruumlneisen parameter of 2.1, agreeing well with handbook values. Osmium shows near elastic anisotropy and small elastic constant changes with temperature (for example, the bulk modulus increases only about 1.2% upon cooling through the studied temperature interval). In all cases, the C(ij)(T) measurements agree well with an Einstein-oscillator model. We consider especially the Poisson ratio, which is low and anisotropic (nu(12)=0.242, nu(13)=0.196) and suggests some covalent interatomic bonding, which may account for osmium's extreme high hardness and the departure of the 5d elements from Friedel's parabolic bulk-modulus/atomic-number model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?