Abstract:The Arctic is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, of which vessel-source black carbon aerosols serving as a prominent catalyst for these changes. This situation is poised to worsen as sea ice melts and shipping lanes change. Rapid action aimed at mitigating short-term climate forcing factors can yield almost immediate climate benefits in the Arctic. This article provides an overview of the legal framework governing black carbon in the Arctic, considering three distinct perspectives: the global, regional, and national dimensions. These perspectives encompass global forums represented by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), with a focus on recent developments concerning black carbon governance, notably the amendments to MARPOL Annex VI and Annex I. Regionally, forums represented by the Arctic Council and the European Union are examined. Black carbon emissions exhibit migratory characteristics, yet the primary legal responsibilities for emission reduction are concentrated within Arctic states. Therefore, this article also delves into the laws and practices of Arctic coastal states in their efforts to combat black carbon emissions, using Canada and Norway as examples. The analysis of institutional effectiveness in this article indicates that, at present, specialized legislation on black carbon is either vague or non-existent. The current Arctic ship-source black carbon governance system faces issues related to leadership ambiguity in its institutional structure, a limited scope of responsible entities, and a lack of diverse implementation measures. Simultaneously, the governance system is questioned for having weak or non-legally binding regulations at the level of legal enforcement. The article anticipates the introduction of more mandatory regulations while also encouraging the selection of non-coercive policy tools. Accordingly, this article argues that a coordinated governance system centered on IMO and the Arctic Council needs to be established. Such a framework should adopt a more inclusive approach to stimulate positive interactions between regulations, aiming to create a broader winning alliance based on the existing foundations.

On Arctic Legal System for Prevention of Oil Pollution

Legal System of Compensation for Marine Oil Pollution in China

Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage from Ships in China: A Way Toward International Standards

Oil tanker risks on the marine environment: An empirical study and policy implications

Study on Theory and Methodology about Joint Prevention and Control of Regional Air Pollution

The role of China in protecting the Arctic against pollutions from vessels: a legal perspective

Investigation of strategies to improve the recycling effectiveness of waste oil from fishing vessels

Joint Development Agreements: Towards Protecting the Marine Environment under International Law

Ensuring Safety and Environmental Protection During International Sea Transportation of Hydrocarbons

The effectiveness of legal framework of Arctic vessel-source black carbon governance

Legal Analysis on Emergency Expenses for Response against Marine Pollution Incidences

Prospects for Regional Soft Law to Protect the South China Sea Marine Environment

ASEAN’s soft law on marine environmental pollution

BAI Jiayu, Chuanbo Beiji Hangxing Falü Wenti Yanjiu [legal Issues Regarding Vessels Operating in the Arctic Waters]

Optimization Design of Countermeasures to Cleanup the Marine Oil Pollution in Different Sea Surface Conditions

Water Legal Protection During Offshore Oil Production in Polar Conditions (Experience of Norway and Russia)

Arctic Policy Developments and Marine Transportation

Governing the Arctic Ocean

International Regulatory Framework for Black Carbon Emissions from Arctic Shipping: Current Situation, Problems, and Development

From melting ice to green shipping: navigating emission reduction challenges in Arctic shipping in the context of climate change

Governance of global vessel-source marine oil spills: Characteristics and refreshed strategies