The Differences of Endothelium-Derived Nitric Oxide and Hyperpolarizing Factor Among Human Internal Mammary Artery,Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein

LIU Zhi-gang,LIU Xiao-cheng,HE Guo-wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2011.06.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective;To study the differences of endothelium-derived nitric oxide(NO) concentration and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor(EDHF)-mediated hyperpolarization among human internal mammary artery(IMA),radial artery(RA) and saphenous vein(SV). Methods;The routinely used blood vessels in coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) were tested by 4 groups;IMA group, n=15,RA group,n = 6,SV group,n = 23,and surgically prepared SV as PV group,n = 9,in which the heparin saline was injected into SV with the pressure of 100~600 mmHg.The vessel segments were taken from CABG patients and placed in 37℃organ chamber.Acetylcholine(ACh)and bradykinin(BK) were applied to induce NO and EDH-releasing.The NO-sensitive electrode and intracellular glass microelectrode were used to measure NO concentration and membrane potential changes and to study EDHF-mediated hyperpolarization. Results:①The basal release of NO in IMA group was greater than RA group and SV group,while RA group was higher than SV group.②With ACh and BK induction,the total NO concentration in IMA group was significantly higher than those in RA group and SV group,RA group was even lower than that in SV group.③Both basal and inducted NO release were significantly decreased in PV group.④EDHF-mediated hyperpolarization was greater in IMA group than those in RA and SV groups.Compared with SV group,the EDHF-mediated hyperpolarization was much higher in RA group,P<0.01~0.05. Conclusion;①For both basal and stimulated condition,IMA has the best NO release,and RA is superior to SV.②With pressure dilatation of SV,NO release at both basal and stimulated condition were severely impaired.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?