Fondaparinux Prevention of Pulmonary Thromboembolism after Surgery: a Meta-analysis

L(U) Lei,ZHANG Ji-wei,ZHANG Bo-gen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7669.2007.11.009
2007-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To assess the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) after surgery.METHODS:All the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of‘fondaparinux’or‘LNWH’in prevention of PTE after surgery from Medline,the Cochrane Library,CMB (January 2000 to June 2007) were comprehensively undertaken with furthermore Meta-analysis conducted on combining the odd ratios of the individual studies through Rev Man 4.2 software statistically.RESULTS:Of the 5 standardized articles screened,10 271 cases were included in the Meta-analysis with the occurrence rates of PTE after surgery (intention-to-treat,ITT) in fondaparinux group as 0.31% vs control group 0.25%,the odds ratio (OR) outcoming 1.23 (95 % CI was 0.59-2.57),with no statistical significance (P0.05).The incidence of major bleeding after surgery of the two groups were 2.82% and 1.89%,respectively,the OR was 1.51 (95% CI was 0.73-1.83),with statistically significant difference (P0.01).The incidence of minor bleeding after surgery of the two groups were 2.73% and 2.37%,respectively, with OR 1.15 (95% CI was 0.90-1.48),having no statistical significance (P0.05).CONCLUSION: Fondaparinux is as effective as LMWH in prevention of PTE after surgery,similar the risk of minor bleeding after surgery,but with a high risk of severe bleeding after surgery in comparing with LMWH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?