Clinical research on the elderly femoral intertrochanteric fractures by using INTERTAN intramedullary nail and PFNA-Ⅱ intramedullary nail
Wei Lu,Fei Yang,Dongliang Li,Wei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.24.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical effect of INTERTAN intramedullary nail and PFNA-Ⅱ intramedullary nail in the treatment of the elderly femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Methods Since October 2010 to August 2014, there were 128 cases of the elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture in our orthopedics, they were treated. According to the AO classification standard to classify, type A1 50 cases, type A2 57 cases and type A3 in 21 cases. Among them 69 cases were treated by using Smith﹠Nephew company INTERTAN intramedullary nail fixation, 59 cases were treated by using Synthes PFNA-Ⅱ intramedullary nail fixation. Compared between two groups patients operation time, amount of bleeding during the operation, incision length, the number of cases of postoperative blood transfusion and volume of blood transfusion, healing time of fracture, internal fixation failure cases, after three months thigh pain and the last follow-up of hip joint function Harris score. Two groups of data, measurement data (operation time, amount of bleeding during the operation, incision length, volume of blood transfusion, healing time of fracture) used t test, numeration data (the number of the postoperative blood transfusion, internal fixation failure cases, after three months thigh pain and the last follow-up of hip joint function Harris score) used chi-square test. Results All the patients were followed up for 8 to 16 months, with an average (10.33±2.75) months. PFNA-Ⅱ group operation time were (50.00±7.82) min, blood loss were (74.00±48.35) ml and postoperative blood transfusion amount were (1.60±0.70) U, were less than that of INTERTAN group, the number of cases of internal fixation failure of INTERTAN group 6 cases was less than PFNA-Ⅱ group 1 case (P<0.05), two groups of length of incision INTERTAN group (4.00±0.94) cm and PFNA-Ⅱ group (3.80±0.79) cm, fracture healing time INTERTAN group (5.20±0.92) months and PFNA-Ⅱ group (5.30±0.95) months, postoperative blood transfusion cases INTERTAN group 41 cases and PFNA-Ⅱ group 38 cases, after 3 months of thigh pain degree INTERTAN group and PFNA-Ⅱgroup, the last follow-up of hip joint function Harris score INTERTAN group excellent 45 cases, good 19 cases, can 3 cases, poor 2 cases and PFNA-Ⅱ group excellent 35 cases, good 15 cases, can 5 cases, poor 4 cases were found no significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusions PFNA-Ⅱ intramedullary nail and INTERTAN intramedullary nail were intramedullary fixation, each has its advantages. PFNA-Ⅱintramedullary nail has the advantages of simple operation, it is suitable for more medical complications and more difficult for a long time operation, INTERTAN intramedullary nail theoretically has higher biomechanical advantages and stability, it can reduce postoperative pain in the thigh. For anti-intertrochanteric fractures, we suggest to use extended intramedullary nailing fixation, it can reduce the local stress concentration and the risk of re-fracture, A2.2 type and more unstable intertrochanteric fracture preferred INTERTAN intramedullary nailing, reduce nail to cut out.