GIS Based Analysis on Spatial Disparity of Economic Growth in BTHMR

DONG Guanpeng,GUO Tengyun,MA Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1047.2010.00797
2010-01-01
Geo-information Science
Abstract:The aim of the paper is to study the spatio-temporal dynamics of per capita GDP in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region(thereafter short for BTHMR).A sample of 140 county-level regions over the period 1995-2007 provides clear evidence of global and local spatial autocorrelation or autodependence as well as spatial heterogeneity.Transition probability matrices were used to verify the robustness of our conclusion.Based on techniques of exploratory spatial data analysis,several conclusions are draw as follows:(1) The economic disparity and spatial concentration of the BTHMR is enlarging,as indicated by coefficients of variation and global Moran's I.The economic disparity and spatial concentration have a positive relationship,indicating that with the increase of spatial concentration,economic disparity may also enlarge.(2) With the Moran scatter plot,the heterogeneity takes on two distinct spatial regimes.One corresponds to the HH scheme including Beijing,Tianjin and Tangshan mainly,the other to the LL scheme including mostly Chengde,Zhang Jiakou and Baoding municipalities,which are surrounding Beijing and Tianjin.(3) The annual average growth rates of per capita GDP also reveal high spatial autocorrelation.Regions with relatively high growth rates are localized close to other regions with relatively high growth rates more than if this localization is purely random,and the statistical significant HH cluster falls mainly into Beijing and Tianjin,indicating that at present,the polarization effect rather than the spread effect of growth pole is dominating.(4) The relationship between initial log per capita GDP and average growth rates is different according to various patterns of local spatial autocorrelation of the initial year.In the HH scheme,initial log per capita GDP and average growth rates have a negative relationship,as an evidence of standard β-convergence models,while for LL scheme,the local autocorrelation type of growth rates of most regions remain falling into the LL scheme,indicating that there are no β-convergence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?